About JS framework
by Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone,
Our infrastructure is mostly a python store, meaning almost all our apps are
written in python and most using wsgi.
However in python we are using a number of framework:
* flask for most
* pyramid for some of the biggest (bodhi, FAS3)
* Django (askbot, Hyperkitty)
* TurboGears2 (fedora-packages)
* aiohttp (python3, async app: mdapi)
While this makes sometime things difficult, these are fairly standard framework
and most of our developers are able to help on all.
However, as I see us starting to look at JS for some of our apps (fedora-hubs,
wartaa...), I wonder if we could start the discussion early about the different
framework and eventually see if we can unify around one.
This would also allow those of us not familiar with any JS framework to look at
the recommended one instead of picking one up semi-randomly.
So has anyone experience with one or more JS framework? Do you have one that
would you recommend? Why?
Thanks for your inputs,
Pierre
11 months, 1 week
CPE Weekly Update - Week of January 24th - 28th
by Patrik Polakovic
Hi everyone,
This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering)
Team. If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this
report or contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat
(https://libera.chat/).
If you wish to read this in the form of a blog post, check the post on
Fedora community blog:
https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/cpe-weekly-update-week-of-january...
# Highlights of the week
## Infrastructure & Release Engineering
Goal of this Initiative
-----------------------
Purpose of this team is to take care of day to day business regarding
CentOS and Fedora Infrastructure and Fedora release engineering work.
It’s responsible for services running in Fedora and CentOS
infrastructure and preparing things for the new Fedora release
(mirrors, mass branching, new namespaces etc.). The ARC (which is a
subset of the team) investigates possible initiatives that CPE might
take on.
Update
------
### Fedora Infra
* Found we had users with _ . - in usernames and were allowing one
character. Fixed noggin and notified all users affected to make new
accounts. Will close invalid ones at end of month.
* Got 3 new x86 machines added to openqa for additional capacity.
* Got 5 new/old x86 machines ready to add to ocp4 clusters.
* Tracked down a bodhi bug with adamw and it got fixed and fix deployed!
* Merged a bunch of infra/ansible PR’s that had been waiting.
* Found that notifs-backend01 is the last thing keeping fas2 around. :(
### CentOS Infra including CentOS CI
* SIGs can now push their centos-release* pkgs to mirror.stream.centos.org
for public consumption.
* Big storage reorganization (multiple HDD issues, or pending - pfa mode-)
, going from out of warranty to still out of warranty node (risk
mitigation).
* Setting up two new IBM Power 9 (ppc64le) boxes for Stream 9 , SIGs and CI
testing.
* WIP: new infra for debuginfod service for Stream 8 and 9.
* Business as usual:
-- New cbs/koji tags and modifying some (welcome Tomas Hrcka to the CentOS
infra team and first ticket assigned to him: adding EPEL{-next} for
buildroots).
-- Some new mirrors for Stream 9.
### Release Engineering
* Mass rebuild finished, then we did another pass, and there’s going to be
yet one more when latest gcc finishes building.
## CentOS Stream
Goal of this Initiative
-----------------------
This initiative is working on CentOS Stream/Emerging RHEL to make this
new distribution a reality. The goal of this initiative is to prepare
the ecosystem for the new CentOS Stream.
Updates
-------
* MR is mostly ready to light up the Stream 8 koji tag structure in the
consolidated buildsystem.
* Preparing for module branching .
* Stream 9 Buildsystem slated for a cage move on 11-Mar-2022.
## CentOS Duffy CI
Goal of this Initiative
-----------------------
Duffy is a system within CentOS CI Infra which allows tenants to provision
and
access bare metal resources of multiple architectures for the purposes of
CI testing.
We need to add the ability to checkout VMs in CentOS CI in Duffy. We have
OpenNebula hypervisor available, and have started developing playbooks which
can be used to create VMs using the OpenNebula API, but due to the current
state
of how Duffy is deployed, we are blocked with new dev work to add the
VM checkout functionality.
Updates
-------
* Ongoing:
-- Legacy API.
-- Node pool maintenance.
## Image builder for Fedora IoT
Goal of this Initiative
-----------------------
Integration of Image builder as a service with Fedora infra to allow Fedora
IoT migrate their pipeline to Fedora infra.
Updates
-------
* The team is focusing on getting all components installed locally:
-- Osbuild-composer
-- Koji + plugins
* Hopefully will be in a good place to talk to image builder from koji stg
once we know what setting up the plugins looks like.
## Bodhi
Goal of this Initiative
-----------------------
This initiative is to separate Bodhi into multiple sub packages, fix
integration and unit tests in CI, fix dependency management and automate
part of the release process.
Read ARC team findings in detail at:
https://fedora-arc.readthedocs.io/en/latest/bodhi/index.html
Updates
-------
* Version 5.7.4 released.
## EPEL
Goal of this initiative
-----------------------
Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux (or EPEL) is a Fedora Special Interest
Group that creates, maintains, and manages a high quality set of additional
packages for Enterprise Linux, including, but not limited to, Red Hat
Enterprise Linux (RHEL), CentOS and Scientific Linux (SL), Oracle Linux
(OL).
EPEL packages are usually based on their Fedora counterparts and will never
conflict with or replace packages in the base Enterprise Linux
distributions. EPEL uses much of the same infrastructure as Fedora,
including buildsystem, bugzilla instance, updates manager, mirror manager
and more.
Updates
-------
* EPEL9 up to 1539 source packages (increase of 193 from last week).
* Several new packagers have expressed specific interest in EPEL.
* Three talks related to EPEL happening next week at the February CentOS
Dojo.
Kindest regards,
CPE Team
1 year, 7 months
RE: F36 Change: Enable fs-verity in RPM (System-Wide Change proposal)
by Roberto Sassu
Hi everyone
(note for the infrastructure mailing list: please check if the changes
I'm proposing could be tested in the Fedora infrastructure, like Copr)
I made the first version of the rpm extension to sign fsverity
digests with a GPG key. The patch set (with some bug fixes)
is available here:
https://github.com/robertosassu/rpm/commits/fsverity-gpg-v1
I tested it locally with my own GPG key. I took an existing
Fedora 34 package and signed it with rpmsign:
$ usr/bin/rpmsign --define "%_gpg_name testhost <testhost(a)test.test>" \
--define "%_file_signing_key _GPG_" \
--define "%_file_signing_cert _GPG_" \
--addsign --signverity tmux-3.1c-2.fc34.x86_64.rpm
I then checked that the package has now fsverity signatures:
$ usr/bin/rpm -qp tmux-3.1c-2.fc34.x86_64.rpm \
--queryformat '[%{RPMTAG_FILENAMES} %{RPMTAG_VERITYSIGNATURES}\n]'
[...]
/usr/bin/tmux iQHHBAABCgAxFiEEEiFa0dGZVYzTrIN+rxtXRMfK0McFAmHq0+4THHRlc3Rob3N0
QHRlc3QudGVzdAAKCRCvG1dEx8rQx81nC/42NW9xJx3rcTiR6/5oL55GPkan+OIq
t2dW1clJUOrxOGVy/5JQTQf0MQXA7gzH1yPgcrskkahjSfWlp4pt7oOw3rukUyaO
zVZxue4XE6XESYtolczK4VEhpc8lbm4hj0e4NCg/dKri/+L5wIdJvmqWNeCfl7uZ
[...]
In a VM I tried to install the modified package. The root filesystem
is ext4 and has the fsverity feature enabled.
The fsverity rpm plugin is also enabled and hasn't been modified
to work with the new PGP signatures.
The kernel includes the patch set I recently sent to the kernel
mailing lists to add support for PGP keys and signatures:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20220111180318.591029-1-roberto.s...
and another patch that calls verify_pgp_signature() in
fs/verity/signature.c.
The first installation attempt fails, due to the missing key
in the .fs-verity keyring:
# usr/bin/rpm -Uhvi ../tmux-3.1c-2.fc34.x86_64.rpm --debug
[...]
D: Plugin: calling hook fsm_file_prepare in fsverity plugin
D: applying signature:
[...]
D: failed to enable verity (errno 126) for /usr/bin/tmux;61ead62d
Then, I added the required GPG key to the .fs-verity keyring:
# cat /mnt/repos/linux/certs/pubring.gpg | keyctl padd asymmetric test %keyring:.fs-verity
76292211
The key is now loaded:
# keyctl show %keyring:.fs-verity
Keyring
66741466 --a-swrv 0 0 keyring: .fs-verity
76292211 --als--v 0 0 \_ asymmetric: test
I retried the tmux installation:
# usr/bin/rpm -Uhvi ../tmux-3.1c-2.fc34.x86_64.rpm --debug
[...]
D: Plugin: calling hook fsm_file_prepare in fsverity plugin
D: applying signature:
[...]
D: fsverity enabled signature for: path /usr/bin/tmux;61ead713 dest /usr/bin/tmux
This time the installation is successful, which means that the PGP
signature has been successfully verified.
Roberto
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH, HRB 56063
Managing Director: Li Peng, Zhong Ronghua
1 year, 8 months
Unsuscribe to list
by Patrice Dufourt
Le sam. 22 janv. 2022, 05:04, <
infrastructure-request(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> a écrit :
> Send infrastructure mailing list submissions to
> infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or
> body 'help' to
> infrastructure-request(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> infrastructure-owner(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of infrastructure digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. CPE Weekly Update - Week of January 17th-22nd (Vipul Siddharth)
> 2. RE: F36 Change: Enable fs-verity in RPM (System-Wide Change proposal)
> (Roberto Sassu)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 19:46:41 +0530
> From: Vipul Siddharth <siddharthvipul1(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: CPE Weekly Update - Week of January 17th-22nd
> To: Fedora Infrastructure <infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>,
> centos-devel(a)centos.org, Development discussions related to
> Fedora
> <devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Message-ID:
> <
> CA+Bo6C0h4C8hoLXikcsQdhEywEcM5FmpRkwo0tiryqz2jbM6bg(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering)
> Team. If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this
> report or contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat
> (https://libera.chat/).
>
> We (CPE team) will be joining Fedora Social Hour on Jan 27th.
> Looking forward to seeing a lot of you!
> (
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/join-us-for-fedora-social-hour-eve...
> )
>
> If you wish to read this in form of a blog post, check the post on
> Fedora community blog:
> (
> https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/cpe-weekly-update-week-of-january...
> )
>
>
> # Highlights of the week
>
> ## Infrastructure & Release Engineering
> Goal of this initiative
> -----------------------
> Purpose of this team is to take care of day to day business regarding
> CentOS and Fedora Infrastructure and Fedora release engineering work.
> It’s responsible for services running in Fedora and CentOS
> infrastructure and preparing things for the new Fedora release
> (mirrors, mass branching, new namespaces etc.). The ARC (which is a
> subset of the team) investigates possible initiatives that CPE might
> take on.
>
> Update
> ------
>
> ### Fedora Infra
> * All koji builders/hubs upgraded to F35 and ready for mass rebuild ( 🤞 )
> * Additional s390x disk space appeared, so added 10 more s390x builders.
> * Fixed IPA issue with certs ( known upgrade bug)
> * Difficult container builds failing issue solved.
>
>
> ### CentOS Infra including CentOS CI
> * CentOS Linux 8 EOL plan
> * Hardware issues (storage box, 64 compute nodes for CI infra)
> * Kmods SIG DuD discussion (koji plugin vs external script)
> * CI storage for ocp/openshift migration completed and working
> faster/better !
> * CentOS CI tenants Survey (for the upcoming DC move)
>
>
>
> ### Release Engineering
> * Mass rebuild starts today
> * Several rawhide issues fixed and composes have been good the last few
> days.
>
>
>
> ## CentOS Stream
> Goal of this initiative
> -----------------------
> This initiative is working on CentOS Stream/Emerging RHEL to make this
> new distribution a reality. The goal of this initiative is to prepare
> the ecosystem for the new CentOS Stream.
>
> Updates
> -------
> * The NFV repo was added to CentOS Stream 8, work is happening now on
> the repo files in centos-release
> * Module branching work is ongoing
> * Libffi is causing some interesting breakage in ELN
> * GCC bugs in ELN
> * Koji/brew Inheritance discussions are still happening
> * Testing Content Resolver with production data before deployment
>
>
>
>
> ## Datanommer/Datagrepper V.2
> Goal of this initiative
> -----------------------
> The datanommer and datagrepper stacks are currently relying on fedmsg which
> we want to deprecate.
> These two applications need to be ported off fedmsg to fedora-messaging.
> As these applications are 'old-timers' in the fedora infrastructure, we
> would
> also like to look at optimizing the database or potentially redesigning it
> to
> better suit the current infrastructure needs.
> For a phase two, we would like to focus on a DB overhaul.
>
> Updates
> -------
> * It’s done! Data is migrated, the new code is now running in prod.
>
>
> ## CentOS Duffy CI
> Goal of this initiative
> -----------------------
> Duffy is a system within CentOS CI Infra which allows tenants to provision
> and
> access bare metal resources of multiple architectures for the purposes of
> CI testing.
> We need to add the ability to checkout VMs in CentOS CI in Duffy. We have
> OpenNebula hypervisor available, and have started developing playbooks
> which
> can be used to create VMs using the OpenNebula API, but due to the current
> state
> of how Duffy is deployed, we are blocked with new dev work to add the
> VM checkout functionality.
>
> Updates
> -------
> * Legacy API
> * Node Pools & Ansible Backend
>
>
> ## Image builder for Fedora IoT
> Goal of this initiative
> -----------------------
> Integration of Image builder as a service with Fedora infra to allow
> Fedora IoT
> migrate their pipeline to Fedora infra.
>
> Updates
> -------
> * Officially kicked off this week
> * Fact finding at the moment
> * Met with Peter Robinson and team from Fedora IoT
> * Need to figure out a way to run their pipeline
> * At least 1 koji plugin to be written + deployed
> * Meeting with Image Builder team tomorrow
> * They are currently blocked by auth, development underway
> * Need to get an idea of their API and what they expect from us
>
>
> ## Bodhi
> Goal of this initiative
> -----------------------
> This initiative is to separate Bodhi into multiple sub packages,
> fix integration and unit tests in CI, fix dependency management,
> and automate part of the release process.
> Read ARC team findings in detail at:
> https://fedora-arc.readthedocs.io/en/latest/bodhi/index.html
>
> Updates
> -------
> * splitting the codebase into separate python packages
> * migrating from CentOS CI to Zuul
>
>
> ## EPEL
> Goal of this initiative
> -----------------------
> Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux (or EPEL) is a Fedora Special Interest
> Group that creates, maintains, and manages a high quality set of additional
> packages for Enterprise Linux, including, but not limited to,
> Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), CentOS and Scientific Linux (SL),
> Oracle Linux (OL).
>
> EPEL packages are usually based on their Fedora counterparts and will never
> conflict with or replace packages in the base Enterprise Linux
> distributions.
> EPEL uses much of the same infrastructure as Fedora, including buildsystem,
> bugzilla instance, updates manager, mirror manager and more.
>
> Updates
> -------
> * epel9 up to 1346 source packages (increase of 188 from last week)
> * Two talks submitted and accepted for the February CentOS Dojo
> * State of EPEL
> * EPEL Packaging Hackfest
>
>
>
> Kindest regards,
> --
> Vipul Siddharth
> He/His/Him
> On behalf of the CPE team
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 16:08:04 +0000
> From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu(a)huawei.com>
> Subject: RE: F36 Change: Enable fs-verity in RPM (System-Wide Change
> proposal)
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
> <devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Cc: "infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org"
> <infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Message-ID: <357929364e1944958ade6098401ef2ce(a)huawei.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi everyone
>
> (note for the infrastructure mailing list: please check if the changes
> I'm proposing could be tested in the Fedora infrastructure, like Copr)
>
> I made the first version of the rpm extension to sign fsverity
> digests with a GPG key. The patch set (with some bug fixes)
> is available here:
>
> https://github.com/robertosassu/rpm/commits/fsverity-gpg-v1
>
> I tested it locally with my own GPG key. I took an existing
> Fedora 34 package and signed it with rpmsign:
>
> $ usr/bin/rpmsign --define "%_gpg_name testhost <testhost(a)test.test>" \
> --define "%_file_signing_key _GPG_" \
> --define "%_file_signing_cert _GPG_" \
> --addsign --signverity
> tmux-3.1c-2.fc34.x86_64.rpm
>
>
> I then checked that the package has now fsverity signatures:
>
> $ usr/bin/rpm -qp tmux-3.1c-2.fc34.x86_64.rpm \
> --queryformat '[%{RPMTAG_FILENAMES}
> %{RPMTAG_VERITYSIGNATURES}\n]'
> [...]
> /usr/bin/tmux
> iQHHBAABCgAxFiEEEiFa0dGZVYzTrIN+rxtXRMfK0McFAmHq0+4THHRlc3Rob3N0
> QHRlc3QudGVzdAAKCRCvG1dEx8rQx81nC/42NW9xJx3rcTiR6/5oL55GPkan+OIq
> t2dW1clJUOrxOGVy/5JQTQf0MQXA7gzH1yPgcrskkahjSfWlp4pt7oOw3rukUyaO
> zVZxue4XE6XESYtolczK4VEhpc8lbm4hj0e4NCg/dKri/+L5wIdJvmqWNeCfl7uZ
> [...]
>
> In a VM I tried to install the modified package. The root filesystem
> is ext4 and has the fsverity feature enabled.
>
> The fsverity rpm plugin is also enabled and hasn't been modified
> to work with the new PGP signatures.
>
> The kernel includes the patch set I recently sent to the kernel
> mailing lists to add support for PGP keys and signatures:
>
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20220111180318.591029-1-roberto.s...
>
> and another patch that calls verify_pgp_signature() in
> fs/verity/signature.c.
>
> The first installation attempt fails, due to the missing key
> in the .fs-verity keyring:
>
> # usr/bin/rpm -Uhvi ../tmux-3.1c-2.fc34.x86_64.rpm --debug
> [...]
> D: Plugin: calling hook fsm_file_prepare in fsverity plugin
> D: applying signature:
> [...]
> D: failed to enable verity (errno 126) for /usr/bin/tmux;61ead62d
>
> Then, I added the required GPG key to the .fs-verity keyring:
>
> # cat /mnt/repos/linux/certs/pubring.gpg | keyctl padd asymmetric test
> %keyring:.fs-verity
> 76292211
>
> The key is now loaded:
>
> # keyctl show %keyring:.fs-verity
> Keyring
> 66741466 --a-swrv 0 0 keyring: .fs-verity
> 76292211 --als--v 0 0 \_ asymmetric: test
>
> I retried the tmux installation:
>
> # usr/bin/rpm -Uhvi ../tmux-3.1c-2.fc34.x86_64.rpm --debug
> [...]
> D: Plugin: calling hook fsm_file_prepare in fsverity plugin
> D: applying signature:
> [...]
> D: fsverity enabled signature for: path /usr/bin/tmux;61ead713 dest
> /usr/bin/tmux
>
> This time the installation is successful, which means that the PGP
> signature has been successfully verified.
>
> Roberto
>
> HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH, HRB 56063
> Managing Director: Li Peng, Zhong Ronghua
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> infrastructure-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedora...
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of infrastructure Digest, Vol 187, Issue 10
> ***********************************************
>
1 year, 8 months
CPE Weekly Update - Week of January 17th-22nd
by Vipul Siddharth
Hi everyone,
This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering)
Team. If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this
report or contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat
(https://libera.chat/).
We (CPE team) will be joining Fedora Social Hour on Jan 27th.
Looking forward to seeing a lot of you!
(https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/join-us-for-fedora-social-hour-eve...)
If you wish to read this in form of a blog post, check the post on
Fedora community blog:
(https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/cpe-weekly-update-week-of-january...)
# Highlights of the week
## Infrastructure & Release Engineering
Goal of this initiative
-----------------------
Purpose of this team is to take care of day to day business regarding
CentOS and Fedora Infrastructure and Fedora release engineering work.
It’s responsible for services running in Fedora and CentOS
infrastructure and preparing things for the new Fedora release
(mirrors, mass branching, new namespaces etc.). The ARC (which is a
subset of the team) investigates possible initiatives that CPE might
take on.
Update
------
### Fedora Infra
* All koji builders/hubs upgraded to F35 and ready for mass rebuild ( 🤞 )
* Additional s390x disk space appeared, so added 10 more s390x builders.
* Fixed IPA issue with certs ( known upgrade bug)
* Difficult container builds failing issue solved.
### CentOS Infra including CentOS CI
* CentOS Linux 8 EOL plan
* Hardware issues (storage box, 64 compute nodes for CI infra)
* Kmods SIG DuD discussion (koji plugin vs external script)
* CI storage for ocp/openshift migration completed and working faster/better !
* CentOS CI tenants Survey (for the upcoming DC move)
### Release Engineering
* Mass rebuild starts today
* Several rawhide issues fixed and composes have been good the last few days.
## CentOS Stream
Goal of this initiative
-----------------------
This initiative is working on CentOS Stream/Emerging RHEL to make this
new distribution a reality. The goal of this initiative is to prepare
the ecosystem for the new CentOS Stream.
Updates
-------
* The NFV repo was added to CentOS Stream 8, work is happening now on
the repo files in centos-release
* Module branching work is ongoing
* Libffi is causing some interesting breakage in ELN
* GCC bugs in ELN
* Koji/brew Inheritance discussions are still happening
* Testing Content Resolver with production data before deployment
## Datanommer/Datagrepper V.2
Goal of this initiative
-----------------------
The datanommer and datagrepper stacks are currently relying on fedmsg which
we want to deprecate.
These two applications need to be ported off fedmsg to fedora-messaging.
As these applications are 'old-timers' in the fedora infrastructure, we would
also like to look at optimizing the database or potentially redesigning it to
better suit the current infrastructure needs.
For a phase two, we would like to focus on a DB overhaul.
Updates
-------
* It’s done! Data is migrated, the new code is now running in prod.
## CentOS Duffy CI
Goal of this initiative
-----------------------
Duffy is a system within CentOS CI Infra which allows tenants to provision and
access bare metal resources of multiple architectures for the purposes of
CI testing.
We need to add the ability to checkout VMs in CentOS CI in Duffy. We have
OpenNebula hypervisor available, and have started developing playbooks which
can be used to create VMs using the OpenNebula API, but due to the current state
of how Duffy is deployed, we are blocked with new dev work to add the
VM checkout functionality.
Updates
-------
* Legacy API
* Node Pools & Ansible Backend
## Image builder for Fedora IoT
Goal of this initiative
-----------------------
Integration of Image builder as a service with Fedora infra to allow Fedora IoT
migrate their pipeline to Fedora infra.
Updates
-------
* Officially kicked off this week
* Fact finding at the moment
* Met with Peter Robinson and team from Fedora IoT
* Need to figure out a way to run their pipeline
* At least 1 koji plugin to be written + deployed
* Meeting with Image Builder team tomorrow
* They are currently blocked by auth, development underway
* Need to get an idea of their API and what they expect from us
## Bodhi
Goal of this initiative
-----------------------
This initiative is to separate Bodhi into multiple sub packages,
fix integration and unit tests in CI, fix dependency management,
and automate part of the release process.
Read ARC team findings in detail at:
https://fedora-arc.readthedocs.io/en/latest/bodhi/index.html
Updates
-------
* splitting the codebase into separate python packages
* migrating from CentOS CI to Zuul
## EPEL
Goal of this initiative
-----------------------
Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux (or EPEL) is a Fedora Special Interest
Group that creates, maintains, and manages a high quality set of additional
packages for Enterprise Linux, including, but not limited to,
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), CentOS and Scientific Linux (SL),
Oracle Linux (OL).
EPEL packages are usually based on their Fedora counterparts and will never
conflict with or replace packages in the base Enterprise Linux distributions.
EPEL uses much of the same infrastructure as Fedora, including buildsystem,
bugzilla instance, updates manager, mirror manager and more.
Updates
-------
* epel9 up to 1346 source packages (increase of 188 from last week)
* Two talks submitted and accepted for the February CentOS Dojo
* State of EPEL
* EPEL Packaging Hackfest
Kindest regards,
--
Vipul Siddharth
He/His/Him
On behalf of the CPE team
1 year, 8 months
