On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 21:20 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
I don't see why that project would get removed. I really think I'm getting misunderstood here.
I think that part of the misunderstanding is that I don't see "six months" as equivalent to "stale". We're not even to the seven year point of RHEL 2.1. And there are definitely things that I personally migrated from elvis -> fedorahosted that, while not relevant with "current" distros still are for older RHEL.
- we send an email to the group members explaining their project is stale
and asking to remove it. 2) they respond saying they'd like to not have it removed. (it stays)
It stays for how long? If we look at the set of what's being talked about here, I can already tell you that the vast majority are going to fall into the "wanting to be kept" category. Which means that we're doing a lot of administrative overhead for how much gain?
- they respond saying its no longer used and it can be removed (we remove
it or they move it elsewhere) 4) no one responds (it gets removed)
Within what time period? And if it later becomes relevant/needed again we just hope that someone has a backup?
Jeremy