On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:24, seth vidal <skvidal(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 10:16 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Interesting test I saw this morning:
> I think we do pretty well overall, but there's some areas we could
> improve in.
You're right, we don't do terribly on that list at all.
We've gotten much better at remote processes and global changes.
Some of our SoP's need to be updated but in general they are documented.
I've thought a bit about the SoPs and I've been wondering - do we want
to move them OUT of the wiki and onto infra.fp.o?
Well we could put them in with the CSI documentation and keep both up
to date hand in hand.
I ask specifically b/c if our stuff goes sideways - recovering
infra.fp.o is a priority but we may not know HOW to without being able
to get to the wiki webserver, let alone the db.
Just a thought...
infrastructure mailing list
Stephen J Smoogen.
"The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance."
Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University.
"Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard
battle." -- Ian MacLaren