Re: Prioritization of tickets and infra work

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:42:12PM +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
>  Hi all,
>  
>  Last week during our weekly meeting we have discuss trying to better
>  prioritize our work and tickets. In order to do that we are going to try to
>  use a "yummy vs trouble" [1] index and use a prioritization matrix [0] to
>  order our work.
>  Yummy representing the added value or benefit of a task and Trouble
>  representing how much effort it would take to complete the task. Each
>  property being either small, medium or large.
>  
>  Starting this week, I ll send a email with a list of 5 tickets from our
>  backlog [1], asking opinions about each tickets yummy and trouble level. We
>  can use this weekly email to ask questions or provide more context. We will
>  then update these tickets with the outcome of the discussion, in case of
>  strong disagreement we can use our weekly IRC meeting to make decision.
>  
>  This will hopefully help us focus on items that provides a high value to
>  our community and also provide a way for everyone to participate in this
>  prioritization. 
Sounds good. 

For things on pagure at least, the best way I can see to codify this is
to make some more tags (yeah, I know we have a bunch already). 

Something like: 

low-trouble
med-trouble
high-trouble
low-gain
med-gain
high-gain

Then, we tag the things we discussed and can search on tags: 

low-trouble + high-gain -> do these first
high-trouble + low-gaiin -> try and see if we can WONTFIX these
etc.

kevin