Responding to a recent status post: http://twitter.com/berrange/status/8231080017
I added Fedora Hosted info to the Wikipedia page in question: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_open_source_software_hosting_faci...
I'd appreciate it if someone knowledgeable could check the information there and correct any oversights or errors. Thanks.
On 31/01/10 17:03, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Responding to a recent status post: http://twitter.com/berrange/status/8231080017
I added Fedora Hosted info to the Wikipedia page in question: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_open_source_software_hosting_faci...
I'd appreciate it if someone knowledgeable could check the information there and correct any oversights or errors. Thanks.
Hey Paul,
I might be wrong, but considering FI has Koji running I would imagine that would be classed as "Build System".
Regards, Tristan
Koji is for building packages for Fedora, once they're approved to be included in Fedora's package repos. If we have resources and people put in a RFR for a Koji instance for hosted projects, we could run one.
Darren L. VanBuren ===================== http://theoks.net/
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:22, Tristan Santore tristan.santore@internexusconnect.net wrote:
On 31/01/10 17:03, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Responding to a recent status post: http://twitter.com/berrange/status/8231080017
I added Fedora Hosted info to the Wikipedia page in question:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_open_source_software_hosting_faci...
I'd appreciate it if someone knowledgeable could check the information there and correct any oversights or errors. Thanks.
Hey Paul,
I might be wrong, but considering FI has Koji running I would imagine that would be classed as "Build System".
Regards, Tristan
-- Tristan Santore BSc MBCS TS4523-RIPE Network and Infrastructure Operations InterNexusConnect Mobile +44-78-55069812 Tristan.Santore@internexusconnect.net
Former Thawte Notary (Please note: Thawte has closed its WoT programme down, and I am therefor no longer able to accredit trust)
For Fedora related issues, please email me at: TSantore@fedoraproject.org
infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 11:47:24AM -0800, Darren VanBuren wrote:
Koji is for building packages for Fedora, once they're approved to be included in Fedora's package repos. If we have resources and people put in a RFR for a Koji instance for hosted projects, we could run one.
Imho this is more what would be needed: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating/KojiPersonalRepos
Without these features in place, I cannot really imagine how a hosted Koji instance could be used easily.
Regards Till
On 01/31/2010 09:16 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 11:47:24AM -0800, Darren VanBuren wrote:
Koji is for building packages for Fedora, once they're approved to be included in Fedora's package repos. If we have resources and people put in a RFR for a Koji instance for hosted projects, we could run one.
Imho this is more what would be needed: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating/KojiPersonalRepos
Without these features in place, I cannot really imagine how a hosted Koji instance could be used easily.
Scratch builds though do allow us to build virtually anything.
-- Jeroen
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 10:35:45AM +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
On 01/31/2010 09:16 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 11:47:24AM -0800, Darren VanBuren wrote:
Koji is for building packages for Fedora, once they're approved to be included in Fedora's package repos. If we have resources and people put in a RFR for a Koji instance for hosted projects, we could run one.
Imho this is more what would be needed: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating/KojiPersonalRepos
Without these features in place, I cannot really imagine how a hosted Koji instance could be used easily.
Scratch builds though do allow us to build virtually anything.
Only builds in Fedora can be used as build dependencies. This already reduces the generic usability. Also scratch builds are removed after a certain time, so one still needs to manually copy the rpms to somewhere else and create a repository, which can then be used. It is better than nothing, but imho not a full supported feature of Fedora Hosted.
Regards Till
On Feb 1, 2010, at 1:35, Jeroen van Meeuwen kanarip@kanarip.com wrote:
On 01/31/2010 09:16 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 11:47:24AM -0800, Darren VanBuren wrote:
Koji is for building packages for Fedora, once they're approved to be included in Fedora's package repos. If we have resources and people put in a RFR for a Koji instance for hosted projects, we could run one.
Imho this is more what would be needed: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating/KojiPersonalRepos
Without these features in place, I cannot really imagine how a hosted Koji instance could be used easily.
Scratch builds though do allow us to build virtually anything.
-- Jeroen
Anything that doesn't require something else outside of Fedora's package set.
-- Jes
On 01/31/2010 06:03 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Responding to a recent status post: http://twitter.com/berrange/status/8231080017
I added Fedora Hosted info to the Wikipedia page in question: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_open_source_software_hosting_faci...
<o/ <o/ <o/ \o> \o> \o>
Great move!
I'd appreciate it if someone knowledgeable could check the information there and correct any oversights or errors. Thanks.
Just a few stabs at what I'm seeing:
1) Wouldn't Transifex be considered a translation system? Google Code and Launchpad are considered to have a translation system and there's extra foo you need to do there, not unlike what you have to do on Fedora Hosted (add transifex user to your scm group and tell somebody about it). Transifex of course is way better then either of the other aforementioned...!!
2) In the way that github allows you to have personal/private branches, and Sourceforge doesn't, isn't Fedora Hosted somewhere in between?
3) The trac system also allows for email2trac (along w/ anti-spam?), ticket templates and code review, and probably more. Maybe that's worth mentioning too.
-- Jeroen
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 10:42:38AM +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
On 01/31/2010 06:03 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Responding to a recent status post: http://twitter.com/berrange/status/8231080017
I added Fedora Hosted info to the Wikipedia page in question: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_open_source_software_hosting_faci...
<o/ <o/ <o/ \o> \o> \o>
Great move!
Thank Daniel Berrange, who posted a status update at some point last week that drew my attention to this oversight.
It would be good if someone else could make a meaningful [[Fedora Hosted]] page on Wikipedia that covers the system similarly to entries for other hosting systems.
I'd appreciate it if someone knowledgeable could check the information there and correct any oversights or errors. Thanks.
Just a few stabs at what I'm seeing:
- Wouldn't Transifex be considered a translation system? Google Code
and Launchpad are considered to have a translation system and there's extra foo you need to do there, not unlike what you have to do on Fedora Hosted (add transifex user to your scm group and tell somebody about it). Transifex of course is way better then either of the other aforementioned...!!
Agreed -- but is the integration as close as with those systems? I'm not arguing one way or the other, I don't have a translated project on Google Code that would help me know.
- In the way that github allows you to have personal/private branches,
and Sourceforge doesn't, isn't Fedora Hosted somewhere in between?
Is it? I'd need more information to be able to tell whether my entry was correct... give me some background and let's see if I got it wrong or right.
- The trac system also allows for email2trac (along w/ anti-spam?),
ticket templates and code review, and probably more. Maybe that's worth mentioning too.
Could be a footnote, right? I'd suggest adding it to the page... it's a wiki! ;-)
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Darren VanBuren -
Jeroen van Meeuwen -
Jesse Keating -
Paul W. Frields -
Till Maas -
Tristan Santore