status.fedoraproject.org

[Kevin Fenzi]

I'm about ready to announce status.fedoraproject.org for folks to start
using.

If everyone could take a minute and check out the current version and
see if there are services we forgot, or services we should remove or
wording we should change, that would be great.

http://status.fedoraproject.org/

or for rss:

http://status.fedoraproject.org/changes.rss

Thanks for any feedback.

I'll probably announce tomorrow pending any stoppers...

kevin

[Stephen John Smoogen]

On 28 August 2012 15:41, Kevin Fenzi  wrote:
> I'm about ready to announce status.fedoraproject.org for folks to start
> using.
>
> If everyone could take a minute and check out the current version and
> see if there are services we forgot, or services we should remove or
> wording we should change, that would be great.
>
> http://status.fedoraproject.org/
>
> or for rss:
>
> http://status.fedoraproject.org/changes.rss
>
> Thanks for any feedback.

Works for me. I got the rss feeds over the weekend and everything.
> I'll probably announce tomorrow pending any stoppers...
>
> kevin
>
> infrastructure mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

[Bruno Wolff III]

On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 15:41:31 -0600,
   Kevin Fenzi  wrote:
> I'm about ready to announce status.fedoraproject.org for folks to start
> using.
>
> If everyone could take a minute and check out the current version and
> see if there are services we forgot, or services we should remove or
> wording we should change, that would be great.

Is there any intent to cover bugzilla? I thought this since there was an 
actual outage today.

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:52:28 -0500
Bruno Wolff III  wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 15:41:31 -0600,
>    Kevin Fenzi  wrote:
> > I'm about ready to announce status.fedoraproject.org for folks to
> > start using.
> >
> > If everyone could take a minute and check out the current version and
> > see if there are services we forgot, or services we should remove or
> > wording we should change, that would be great.
>
> Is there any intent to cover bugzilla? I thought this since there was
> an actual outage today.

Well, we could add it, but the thing is that we have no control over it
or anything to do with it's administration. So, the first we hear about
problems are when someone asks us. We do sometimes hear about scheduled
maint/scheduled downtime, so I suppose that might be worthwhile...

I fear it might lead to people asking us admin type questions about
bugzilla, to which we would have to say we don't run it. ;(

kevin

[Stephen John Smoogen]

On 28 August 2012 15:52, Bruno Wolff III  wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 15:41:31 -0600,
>   Kevin Fenzi  wrote:
> > I'm about ready to announce status.fedoraproject.org for folks to start
> > using.
> >
> > If everyone could take a minute and check out the current version and
> > see if there are services we forgot, or services we should remove or
> > wording we should change, that would be great.
>
> Is there any intent to cover bugzilla? I thought this since there was an
> actual outage today.

I would say no. We don't run the service and outages with it are
outside our perview of knowing what is going on with it.. at best we
would just sya "its down" and hours later when someone said it was
working again change it to "its working again."