Primary DNS

[Mike McGrath]

anyone have any issues if we move primary DNS off of fpserv and onto the 
torrent.fedoraproject.org box?  What are your thoughts on using phx as 
the primary DNS site?

    -Mike

[Dennis Gilmore]

On Thursday 08 March 2007 04:05:35 pm Mike McGrath wrote:
>  anyone have any issues if we move primary DNS off of fpserv and onto
> the
>  torrent.fedoraproject.org box?  What are your thoughts on using phx as
>  the primary DNS site?
>
>      -Mike 
Torrent box sounds fine,  id like to keep DNS out of PHX  just for the
sake of 
not having all our eggs there. if PHX goes down and its the primary  its 
could be harder to redirect elsewhere.  I can host a slave if wanted.  I 
think we should have 3 or 4 DNS boxes not the 2 we currently have.


-- 
Dennis Gilmore, RHCE

[Mike McGrath]

Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>  On Thursday 08 March 2007 04:05:35 pm Mike McGrath wrote:
>    
> > anyone have any issues if we move primary DNS off of fpserv and onto the
> > torrent.fedoraproject.org box?  What are your thoughts on using phx as
> > the primary DNS site?
> >
> >     -Mike
> >     
>  Torrent box sounds fine,  id like to keep DNS out of PHX  just for the sake of 
>  not having all our eggs there. if PHX goes down and its the primary  its 
>  could be harder to redirect elsewhere.  I can host a slave if wanted.  I 
>  think we should have 3 or 4 DNS boxes not the 2 we currently have.
>     
+1 on that  Though it might be good to have a secondary there.

    -Mike

[Dennis Gilmore]

On Thursday 08 March 2007 04:23:17 pm Mike McGrath wrote:
>  Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>  > On Thursday 08 March 2007 04:05:35 pm Mike McGrath wrote:
>  >> anyone have any issues if we move primary DNS off of fpserv and onto the
>  >> torrent.fedoraproject.org box?  What are your thoughts on using phx as
>  >> the primary DNS site?
>  >>
>  >>     -Mike
>  >
>  > Torrent box sounds fine,  id like to keep DNS out of PHX  just for the
>  > sake of not having all our eggs there. if PHX goes down and its the
>  > primary  its could be harder to redirect elsewhere.  I can host a slave
>  > if wanted.  I think we should have 3 or 4 DNS boxes not the 2 we
>  > currently have.
>
>  +1 on that  Though it might be good to have a secondary there.
>
>      -Mike 
Secondary in PHX would be fine. i just don't think the primary should be.

-- 
Dennis Gilmore, RHCE

[Ask Bjørn Hansen]

On Mar 8, 2007, at 14:18, Dennis Gilmore wrote:

>  I think we should have 3 or 4 DNS boxes not the 2 we currently have.
I run DNS for perl.org and some of the apache.org DNS servers - I'd  
be happy to offer a secondary as well.  (In the past I've also helped  
with DNS for some Quite Busy[1] DNS BL zones...)


  - ask

[1]  I'm sure it's not much compared to some top level zones, but it  
was megabits of DNS traffic per server

-- 
http://develooper.com/ - http://askask.com/

[Mike McGrath]

Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
>  On Mar 8, 2007, at 14:18, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
> > I think we should have 3 or 4 DNS boxes not the 2 we currently have.
>
>  I run DNS for perl.org and some of the apache.org DNS servers - I'd be 
>  happy to offer a secondary as well.  (In the past I've also helped 
>  with DNS for some Quite Busy[1] DNS BL zones...)
>
>
>   - ask
>
>  [1]  I'm sure it's not much compared to some top level zones, but it 
>  was megabits of DNS traffic per server 
Thats good to know, thanks.

    -Mike