On Thu, Apr 9, 2020, at 1:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2020-04-09 at 12:54 -0400, James Cassell wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020, at 12:33 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:41 AM Tomas Tomecek <ttomecek(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
[snip]
> > >
> > > I'm assuming you're using pagure.io - at this point, we're not
going
> > > to integrate packit with pagure (for obvious reasons). What are your
> > > future plans for the git forge?
> >
> > What the heck are you talking about? pagure.io is not going away
> > anytime soon. And there will be other pagure instances that host
> > source code that packit integration support would be useful for.
> >
> > Hell, I've already offered to help with the pagure.io service.
> >
>
> The whole situation is bit unfortunate, as the announcement made it
> seem like pagure.io is going away.
I mean, I have my issues with the announcement, but this seems like an
unfair criticism. The *first paragraph* ends with "We are opting for
GitLab for our dist git and project hosting and will continue to run
pagure.io with community assistance." Every other mention of pagure.io
clearly communicates that it will continue to run for at least a year
and the preference is to keep it running permanently with community
maintenance. I don't know where you get the idea that it is going away
from the announcement.
"at least a year" sounds like it's going away in a year from now in a
"writing is on the wall" sort of way. I myself do understand it's not the
plan to get rid of pagure.io, but I think many have a perception that it's future is
uncertain.
Container Linux was going to stay around for a year after FCOS came out, but that got cut
short to less than a year.
V/r,
James Cassell