java-devel February 2010

java-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

11 participants
7 discussions

ivy
by Orion Poplawski 13 Apr '10

13 Apr '10

Has anyone dealt with any projects that use ivy? Appears to be similar to maven and downloads jars automatically, so it's probably going to need similar treatment to maven in the build system. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com

1 1

Need help with maven poms
by Orion Poplawski 19 Feb '10

19 Feb '10

I've packaged up jempbox and fontbox, prereqs for pdfbox. Now trying to build pdfbox I get: Downloading: file:///usr/share/maven2/repository/JPP/maven2/default_poms/org.apache.pdfbox-fontbox.pom Downloading: file:///usr/share/maven2/repository/JPP/maven2/default_poms/org.apache.pdfbox-jempbox.pom ... Missing: ---------- 1) org.apache.pdfbox:fontbox:jar:1.0.0 Try downloading the file manually from the project website. Then, install it using the command: mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=org.apache.pdfbox -DartifactId=fontbox -Dversion=1.0.0 - Dpackaging=jar -Dfile=/path/to/file Alternatively, if you host your own repository you can deploy the file there: mvn deploy:deploy-file -DgroupId=org.apache.pdfbox -DartifactId=fontbox -Dversion=1.0.0 -Dp ackaging=jar -Dfile=/path/to/file -Durl=[url] -DrepositoryId=[id] Path to dependency: 1) org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox:bundle:1.0.0 2) org.apache.pdfbox:fontbox:jar:1.0.0 2) org.apache.pdfbox:jempbox:jar:1.0.0 Try downloading the file manually from the project website. Then, install it using the command: mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=org.apache.pdfbox -DartifactId=jempbox -Dversion=1.0.0 - Dpackaging=jar -Dfile=/path/to/file Alternatively, if you host your own repository you can deploy the file there: mvn deploy:deploy-file -DgroupId=org.apache.pdfbox -DartifactId=jempbox -Dversion=1.0.0 -Dp ackaging=jar -Dfile=/path/to/file -Durl=[url] -DrepositoryId=[id] Path to dependency: 1) org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox:bundle:1.0.0 2) org.apache.pdfbox:jempbox:jar:1.0.0 I don't see /usr/share/maven2/repository/JPP/maven2/default_poms/org.apache.pdfbox-fontbox.pom or /usr/share/maven2/repository/JPP/maven2/default_poms/org.apache.pdfbox-jempbox.pom present, but there is /usr/share/maven2/poms/JPP-fontbox.pom: <project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd"> <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion> <parent> <groupId>org.apache</groupId> <artifactId>apache</artifactId> <version>6</version> </parent> <groupId>org.apache.pdfbox</groupId> <artifactId>fontbox</artifactId> <version>1.0.0</version> <packaging>bundle</packaging> I suspect I'm not packaging the pom correctly as part of the pdfbox project, but not sure how to fix. Help please? fontbox spec has: cp -p pom.xml $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/maven2/poms/JPP-%{name}.pom %add_to_maven_depmap org.apache.maven %{name} %{version} JPP %{name} Thanks! -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com

2 2

about updating itext
by Orcan Ogetbil 18 Feb '10

18 Feb '10

Hi all, I have been thinking about updating itext from 2.1 7 to 5.0.1. It sounds like a huge jump but in reality, there was only one version it between, 5.0.0. However, the 5.0.x update is not fully backward compatible. Here are the changes: 1- Instead of com.lowagie.text, the new itext uses the path com.itexpdf.text. This is easy to fix on dependent packages: - pdftk (I am a comaintainer. I already made a patch for this) - tuxguitar (I am the maintainer) - libfonts - liblayout I don't maintain the last two but I can patch them up if it is okay, 2- We used to ship itext with xml support. This part of the code was not in the itext-2.1.7 tree but we had ported this over from a 1.x release [1]. I am not familiar with this part of the code and I was told that this add-on was needed by maven. Is this still valid? The issue is, itext-5.0.0+ dropped some other part of its code, which our xml patch was depending on. In particular, the rtf support of itext moved to a separate project [2] Now we have a few options: 1- Package the new project separately. And move the xml patch to this package. 2- Drop rtf bits from our xml patch (I don't know if this is possible. I didn't check. overholt?) 3- Don't update itext. Stick with 2.1.7 for now. As I don't know what that xml patch does with maven, I hesitate updating itext. By the way, why does maven not require itext? Here is an initial attempt for the 5.0.1 update without xml support: [3] Please share your ideas, potential problems, solutions, proposals etc. Cheers, Orcan [1] http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/itext/devel/itext-xmloutput.patch?… [2] http://sourceforge.net/projects/itextrtf [3] http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/itext-5.0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm

3 6

Page update request
by Ankur Sinha 12 Feb '10

12 Feb '10

hi, I was reading up on java stack traces etc when I came across this page[1]. Can someone please take out a few minutes and update the page please? It still speaks of FC5. regards [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JavaStackTraces -- -- Ankur Sinha - FAS : ankursinha - franciscod @ Freenode

1 0

Java Projects
by Rajmahendra 12 Feb '10

12 Feb '10

Hi all, I am Raj from chennai. I am basically a Java/J2ee Software engineer. Just wondering what are the Java projects going on in Fedora. Meet you all soon Raj

3 2

jakarta-commons-lang 2.4
by Jerry James 10 Feb '10

10 Feb '10

I maintain findbugs, whose latest version needs jakarta-commons-lang 2.4. We currently ship 2.3. The upstream release notes [1][2] claim that 2.4 has no incompatibilities with 2.3. On the other hand, I see that jpackage (5.0) has both a jakarta-commons-lang (version 2.3) package and a jakarta-commons-lang24 package, but I don't know why. According to repoquery, these packages currently require jakarta-commons-lang: directory-naming eclipse-mylyn findbugs jakarta-commons-cli jakarta-commons-configuration jeuclid maven2 maven2-plugin-changes maven2-plugin-enforcer maven2-plugin-gpg maven2-plugin-jar maven2-plugin-javadoc openoffice.org-wiki-publisher plexus-registry Do the maintainers of any of these packages have any reason why jakarta-commons-lang should not be upgraded from 2.3 to 2.4? References: [1] http://commons.apache.org/lang/upgradeto2_4.html [2] http://commons.apache.org/lang/article2_4.html -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/

5 10

Looking Solution for Java Applet
by Umesh Sharma 03 Feb '10

03 Feb '10

Dear all i am using fedora 11 . I am facing problem with Java applet all fonts display are too small not readable. i tried jre 1.6,1.5 but same problem and jre 1.3 feroda not accepting. my server having jre 1.1.4 ver. please suggest me how can i solve this problem.thanks in advance.. Umesh

2 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

java-devel February 2010