default vm memory settings for fedora eclipse
by Benjamin Konrath
Hi,
Now that Eclipse requires IcedTea by deault on x86 and x86_64 I'd like
to change the default vm memory settings to be something a little more
sane. Right now the -vmargs option is set to "-Xms40m -Xmx256m". What
should I change it to?
Thanks, Ben
15 years, 12 months
java.home/java.library.path etc, what can I rely on ?
by Caolán McNamara
So, for..
class findhome
{
public static void main(String args[])
{
System.out.println(System.getProperty("java.home"));
System.out.println(System.getProperty("gnu.classpath.home.url"));
System.out.println(System.getProperty("java.library.path"));
}
}
javac findhome.java
java findhome
I have (on x86_64) ...
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-1.5.0.0/jre
file:///usr/lib64
/usr/lib64/gcj-4.1.2
For something like OOo we have two sort of requirements,
at run time we'd like to dlopen libjvm.so, currently the approach I took for gcj
was to stick lib/ARCH/client/libjvm.so onto the value of java.home. I guess from the
output here searching through java.library.path is also plausible ?
The other requirement is at buildtime to link against libjawt.so and to find the
java headers.
but for e.g. suse right now apparently the output of the above (for i386) is..
/usr
file:///usr/lib/gcc/i586-suse-linux/4.2.1
/usr/lib/gcj-4.2.1
So what I'm wondering is if there is a canonical reference to what the various
properties should refer to. i.e. are my assumptions just busted, or is e.g. the
suse gcj misconfigured and if there is more correct way to find libjvm.so. And
while I'm at it is there a good solid cross platform and cross java-impl test
to find the correct include and link path to build against the java headers and
link to libjawt and friends.
C.
16 years
Packaging jgoodies-looks and jgoodies-forms
by Mary Ellen Foster
I'm thinking of packaging jgoodies-looks and jgoodies-forms for Fedora
-- they're required for the GUI admin tool for the Ice distributed
object middleware that I'm also wanting to package: it's a big package
that's currently under review
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612). I
already have local packages of jgoodies that I use for building my own
version of Ice, but it's not in Fedora yet so I've disable that part
of the build for now in the package under review.
Is there anything I should be aware of when packaging jgoodies, or
should I just go for it. :)
Thanks,
MEF
--
Mary Ellen Foster
http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/
16 years, 1 month
don't build debuginfo package
by alcapcom
Hi list,
I have a problem to build a Eclipse plugin package[1] in rawhide, that
seems to be a bug in the last RPM package, I will fill a bug about this
today. At first view, all Java package that include classes outside a
jar file can have the same troubles (I should test this today too).
With the coming of AcedTea as default JRE for F8 the debuginfo package
can be useful only for 0,1% of our users base, that amount of people is
probably less than that because the user must work on a ppc arch using
eclipse-rse (the package that give problem) and must will to debug it.
So, what do you think about adding %define debug_package %{nil} on the
top of the specfile while this bug is not solved in the RPM package.
[1]
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/2007-August/msg000...
Thanks,
Alphonse
16 years, 1 month
FOP for F8?
by Karsten Wade
I've been watching the progress with IcedTea, and am wondering if anyone
has plans to package FOP for Fedora 8?
I guess I should ask the same thing about Saxon. :)
We have a patch for xmlto in bugzilla waiting for FOP to be in the
distro so we can set it as a target. I wanted to get a status to find
out if we should/could be pushing people to get all the pieces we need
for a FOP toolchain to produce PDFs from DocBook XML.
cheers - Karsten
--
Karsten Wade ^ Fedora Documentation Project
Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
quaid.fedorapeople.org | gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
16 years, 1 month
Re: [fedora-java] FOP for F8?
by Francis Kung
Hi,
> As Tom mentioned, I have successfully built the latest Batik Beta on
> IcedTea. I am currently updating the Batik srpm to that version.
There's a bug or two in IcedTea that causes a number of the Batik tests
to crash, which I'm currently tracking down.
> As for FOP, I haven't tried building that on IcedTea yet, as I am trying
> to resolve a bunch of dependencies issues - I need to install many
> packages first.
I just did a build of FOP 0.92 (I had the sources lying around from many
months ago when this last came up); it builds with IcedTea and all the
bundled examples are generated properly. I haven't tried anything more
complicated, ie combining FOP and Batik to run the entire toolchain,
though. I also haven't tried using the srpm, so I don't know what
packaging-related tasks are outstanding, and haven't tried building the
newer 0.93 or 0.94.
Cheers,
Francis
16 years, 1 month
Re: FeatureEclipse33 Status
by Benjamin Konrath
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 14:50 -0400, Igor Foox wrote:
> Hey Ben,
>
> That sounds great, but I don't have access to fedora stuff atm,
> because I don't have all the certs set up. I don't think you need me
> to add you to the ACL, I believe you should be able to ask to be
> added. Of course I could be wrong. :)
Yep, you're wrong :) You have to to approve my requests for commit
access here:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/
If you can't do this, let me know and I'll request to have the ownership
of eclipse-pydev moved to me.
Thanks, Ben
> Igor
>
> On 8/21/07, Ben Konrath <bkonrath(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 09:13 -0400, Igor Foox wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > On 8/14/07, Andrew Overholt <overholt(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Here's the status of the Fedora 8 feature of updating the Eclipse stack
> > > > to the 3.3 (Europa) base [1]. I've CC'd all of the maintainers. Please
> > > > reply with answers where you can.
> > > >
> > > > PyDev (Igor Foox)
> > > > - Igor: can you update to latest version that works with 3.3? If not,
> > > > can you orphan it? Ben says he can take it over if you don't have time.
> > > > - would be nice to get Mylyn integration in when we update
> > >
> > > I won't have the time to update PyDev for this release unfortunately.
> > > I would appreciate it if Ben could take over for now. I will probably
> > > be able to take it back in a month or two.
> >
> > Ok, can you add me to the ACL and I'll update it for this release? Why
> > don't we say that we're co-maintaining pydev so that you can still help
> > out when you have time.
> >
> > Thanks, Ben
> >
> >
16 years, 1 month
FeatureEclipse33 Status
by Andrew Overholt
Hi,
Here's the status of the Fedora 8 feature of updating the Eclipse stack
to the 3.3 (Europa) base [1]. I've CC'd all of the maintainers. Please
reply with answers where you can.
SDK (Ben Konrath)
- largely done
- working through a build-id issue
- needs jetty5 review and inclusion (bug #202334)
- need to investigate tweaking memory limits in eclipse.ini if IcedTea
gets into F8
Mylyn (Andrew Overholt)
- awaiting CVS rename
- otherwise good to go
EMF (Andrew Overholt)
- would require a *tonne* of changes: probably multiple new SRPMs, lots
of Provides and Obsoletes
- since nothing depends upon it, I propose we drop it from Fedora 8
- anyone object? care to take it over?
GEF (Andrew Overholt)
- since nothing depends upon it, I propose we drop it from Fedora 8
- see last comment under EMF :)
ChangeLog (Jeff Johnston)
- mostly complete (I think)
- Jeff?
CDT & autotools (Jeff Johnston)
- ready AFAIK
- Jeff?
Subclipse (Robert Marcano)
- ready, right, Robert?
PyDev (Igor Foox)
- Igor: can you update to latest version that works with 3.3? If not,
can you orphan it? Ben says he can take it over if you don't have time.
- would be nice to get Mylyn integration in when we update
sdl-nls, nlspackager (Andrew Overholt)
- I'm going to remove these since there are no translations for 3.3
upstream
checkstyle (Rob Myers)
- things are good to go, right, Rob?
quickrex (Alphonse Van Assche)
- things work with 3.3, right, Alphonse?
phpeclipse (Brandon Holbrook)
- do things work with 3.3, Brandon?
specfile editor (Alphonse Van Assche ... yes, I'm perhaps jumping the
gun a bit here ;)
- are we good to get this in by test2, Alphonse?
Thanks,
Andrew
[1]
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FeatureEclipse33
16 years, 1 month
Re: FeatureEclipse33 Status
by Benjamin Konrath
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 09:13 -0400, Igor Foox wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On 8/14/07, Andrew Overholt <overholt(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here's the status of the Fedora 8 feature of updating the Eclipse stack
> > to the 3.3 (Europa) base [1]. I've CC'd all of the maintainers. Please
> > reply with answers where you can.
> >
> > PyDev (Igor Foox)
> > - Igor: can you update to latest version that works with 3.3? If not,
> > can you orphan it? Ben says he can take it over if you don't have time.
> > - would be nice to get Mylyn integration in when we update
>
> I won't have the time to update PyDev for this release unfortunately.
> I would appreciate it if Ben could take over for now. I will probably
> be able to take it back in a month or two.
Ok, can you add me to the ACL and I'll update it for this release? Why
don't we say that we're co-maintaining pydev so that you can still help
out when you have time.
Thanks, Ben
16 years, 1 month
Fedora 7 and Eclipse 3.3
by root
Hi,
When I try to run eclipse 3.3 on fedora 7, it gives some memory leak
warnings as following
GC Warning: Repeated allocation of very large block (appr. Size 651264)
May lead to memory leak and poor performance
I get this warning even after changing memory size to max (512) in
eclipse.ini
And later, when I add more plug-ins to eclipse and try running that, it
gives segmentation fault.
Please let me know if there is any workaround.
Thanks,
Deeptika
16 years, 1 month
