jakarta-commons rename

[Stanislav Ochotnicky]

Hi,

as some of you are aware jakarta-commons changed name to apache-commons
some time ago. We should probably start process of renaming these
packages in Fedora as well to match upstream.

I made a list of -commons components that do not depend on other
-commons. This was done with a crude grep of checked out sources so
there might be omissions). Owners of packages included:

jakarta-commons-codec - mbooth
jakarta-commons-launcher - mbooth
jakarta-commons-logging - mbooth
jakarta-commons-pool - mbooth

jakarta-commons-daemon - pcheung
jakarta-commons-io - pcheung
jakarta-commons-lang - pcheung
jakarta-commons-net - pcheung

jakarta-commons-collections - devrim

jakarta-commons-compress - red

jakarta-commons-el - fnasser


Starting with these packages should make it easier to continue with the
rest (because for those we can already start using new names in Requires).

Any ideas/notes are welcome,


-- 
Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky(a)redhat.com&gt;
Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno

PGP: 71A1677C
Red Hat Inc.                               http://cz.redhat.com

[Mat Booth]

2010/5/4 Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky(a)redhat.com&gt;:
>  Hi,
>
>  as some of you are aware jakarta-commons changed name to apache-commons
>  some time ago. We should probably start process of renaming these
>  packages in Fedora as well to match upstream.
>  
Hi,

Indeed, this has been on my TODO list for a while. I will get to this
Real Soon Now(tm), I promise :-)

Regards,
Mat

PS. You wanted mbooth(a)fedoraproject.org, not @redhat.com ;-)

-- 
Mat Booth

[Stanislav Ochotnicky]

On 05/04/2010 02:31 PM, Mat Booth wrote:
>  2010/5/4 Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky(a)redhat.com&gt;:
> > Hi,
> >
> > as some of you are aware jakarta-commons changed name to apache-commons
> > some time ago. We should probably start process of renaming these
> > packages in Fedora as well to match upstream.
> >
>  
>  Hi,
>  
>  Indeed, this has been on my TODO list for a while. I will get to this
>  Real Soon Now(tm), I promise :-) 
Perfect

I opened a bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588764 to
track progress. When you create package review requests please add their
bz# to depends on this bug.

I will also create wiki page so that everyone will know current status
of all jakarta-commons packages (renamed/on review/waiting for
deps/etc.). Will post link later on


>  PS. You wanted mbooth(a)fedoraproject.org, not @redhat.com ;-) 

Yes I noticed two things after I sent the email:
 1. someone (TB or mailing list perhaps) screwed up CC (there were 6
people in there when I was sending the mail, only 3 are present in the
message on the mailing list)

 2. some people had old emails because they were automatically added
from LDAP for me. Didn't realize they were deprecated. I'm crossing my
fingers hoping they are reading the mailing list :-)


Regards,

-- 
Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky(a)redhat.com&gt;
Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno

PGP: 71A1677C
Red Hat Inc.                               http://cz.redhat.com

[Stanislav Ochotnicky]

On 05/04/2010 10:43 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
I will also create wiki page so that everyone will know current status
of all jakarta-commons packages (renamed/on review/waiting for
deps/etc.). Will post link later on

As promised here it is:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JakartaCommonsRename

Also reminder for the tracker bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588764

We should be able to paralelize after first few packages are reviewed.


-- 
Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky(a)redhat.com&gt;
Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno

PGP: 71A1677C
Red Hat Inc.                               http://cz.redhat.com

[Adam Young]

Are we going to do

Provides: jakarta-commons-X

To keep from redoing all of the dependency packages?



On 05/04/2010 11:58 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>  On 05/04/2010 10:43 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>  I will also create wiki page so that everyone will know current status
>  of all jakarta-commons packages (renamed/on review/waiting for
>  deps/etc.). Will post link later on
>
>  As promised here it is:
>  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JakartaCommonsRename
>
>  Also reminder for the tracker bug:
>  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588764
>
>  We should be able to paralelize after first few packages are reviewed.
>
>
>     
>
>
>  --
>  java-devel mailing list
>  java-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel

[Mat Booth]

On 4 May 2010 19:26, Adam Young <ayoung(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  Are we going to do
>
>  Provides: jakarta-commons-X
>
>  To keep from redoing all of the dependency packages?
>
>  
I would say that yes, the standard obsoletes/provides policy should
apply as this will also prevent conflicts from JPackage installed
packages.

-- 
Mat Booth