* Mat Booth <fedora(a)matbooth.co.uk> [2014-04-22 05:50]:
On 16 April 2014 14:35, Deepak Bhole <dbhole(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
* Mat Booth <fedora(a)matbooth.co.uk> [2014-04-16 04:36]:
>
>
>
> On 15 April 2014 17:55, Fedora Rawhide Report <rawhide(a)fedoraproject.org>
> wrote:
>
>
> Broken deps for i386
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> [sinjdoc]
> sinjdoc-0.5-16.fc21.i686 requires java-gcj-compat >= 0:1.0.70
> sinjdoc-0.5-16.fc21.i686 requires java-gcj-compat >= 0:1.0.70
>
>
> Can sinjdoc be retired now? I can't think of a case where you would use
it over
> the OpenJDK implementation of javadoc.
>
I agree, it should be retired. I have done so in pkgdb.
Thanks for bringing it to attention!
Deepak
No problem.
It's still showing up in the rawhide report however. If you use "fedpkg
retire"
command, that should also automatically block the package in rawhide.
Sorry for the late reply.. just tried this and got an error:
"dbhole is not allowed to change ownership of this package"
Looks like retiring in pkgdb first was a bad idea. Wish the tool had
warned :/ Is it still showing up in the report?
Deepak