I notice the Eclipse wiki page [1] has been updated. We have more plugins in Fedora now than I've had chance to use, which is very cool. I use this fact to try and persuade my Ubuntu-using developer friends to cross over to the red-hatted side. ;-)
Seeing the page made me think that the Fedora Eclipse comps group [2] is terribly outdated. Should we be adding our plugins to this group? Here's how it currently looks:
<group> <id>eclipse</id> <_name>Fedora Eclipse</_name> <_description>Integrated Development Environments based on Eclipse.</_description> <default>false</default> <uservisible>true</uservisible> <packagelist> <packagereq type="default">eclipse-cdt</packagereq> <packagereq type="default">eclipse-changelog</packagereq> <packagereq type="default">eclipse-jdt</packagereq> <packagereq type="default">eclipse-mylyn</packagereq> <packagereq type="default">eclipse-mylyn-bugzilla</packagereq> <packagereq type="default">eclipse-mylyn-ide</packagereq> <packagereq type="default">eclipse-mylyn-java</packagereq> <packagereq type="default">eclipse-pde</packagereq> <packagereq type="default">eclipse-pydev</packagereq> <packagereq type="default">eclipse-rpm-editor</packagereq> <packagereq type="default">eclipse-subclipse</packagereq> <packagereq type="optional">eclipse-mylyn-trac</packagereq> </packagelist> </group>
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Eclipse [2] http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/comps/comps-f11.xml.in
Hi,
* Mat Booth fedora@matbooth.co.uk [2009-02-13 15:58]:
I notice the Eclipse wiki page [1] has been updated.
Yeah, I'd like for us all to try to keep it up to date; especially as I'm going to retire the old sourceware.org/eclipse pages.
We have more plugins in Fedora now than I've had chance to use, which is very cool. I use this fact to try and persuade my Ubuntu-using developer friends to cross over to the red-hatted side. ;-)
:)
Seeing the page made me think that the Fedora Eclipse comps group [2] is terribly outdated. Should we be adding our plugins to this group?
Yeah, we should update it. Let's discuss potential patches here.
Thanks for bringing this up.
Andrew
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Andrew Overholt overholt@redhat.com wrote:
Seeing the page made me think that the Fedora Eclipse comps group [2] is terribly outdated. Should we be adding our plugins to this group?
Yeah, we should update it. Let's discuss potential patches here.
We should at least include all the IDE plugins in the "Fedora Eclipse" group as optionals to make them 'discoverable,' as it were:
eclipse-birt eclipse-dtp eclipse-egit eclipse-epic eclipse-photran eclipse-phpeclipse eclipse-quickrex eclipse-shelled eclipse-slide
It might also be a good idea to put actual eclipse development stuff in the "Java Development" group:
eclipse-emf-sdk eclipse-emf-xsd-sdk eclipse-gef-sdk
Mat Booth wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Andrew Overholt overholt@redhat.com wrote:
Seeing the page made me think that the Fedora Eclipse comps group [2] is terribly outdated. Should we be adding our plugins to this group?
Yeah, we should update it. Let's discuss potential patches here.
We should at least include all the IDE plugins in the "Fedora Eclipse" group as optionals to make them 'discoverable,' as it were:
eclipse-birt eclipse-dtp
I don't like the idea of putting birt and dtp until they are fully builded. These packages contain only a small part of birt and dtp (as needed by valgrind) and until they are fully functional , including them will cause only confusion in users - I installed eclipse-birt but birt is not available. Let them be pulled by dependencies only when needed. If we decide to add eclipse-valgrind (soon to enter rawhide) to the list this wouldn't matter because it requires them.
eclipse-egit eclipse-epic eclipse-photran eclipse-phpeclipse eclipse-quickrex eclipse-shelled eclipse-slide
To the previous I would add: eclipse-cmake eclipse-moreunit eclipse-rpmstubby
Best regards, Alexander Kurtakov
Hi,
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 13:54 +0100, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
Mat Booth wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Andrew Overholt overholt@redhat.com wrote:
Seeing the page made me think that the Fedora Eclipse comps group [2] is terribly outdated. Should we be adding our plugins to this group?
Yeah, we should update it. Let's discuss potential patches here.
We should at least include all the IDE plugins in the "Fedora Eclipse" group as optionals to make them 'discoverable,' as it were:
eclipse-birt eclipse-dtp
I don't like the idea of putting birt and dtp until they are fully builded.
Agreed. Hopefully that'll be soon :)
eclipse-egit eclipse-epic eclipse-photran eclipse-phpeclipse eclipse-quickrex eclipse-shelled eclipse-slide
To the previous I would add: eclipse-cmake eclipse-moreunit eclipse-rpmstubby
Sounds good. I *think* I have commit access to the comps module so if someone wants to send a patch, I can try committing.
Andrew
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Andrew Overholt <overholt redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 13:54 +0100, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
Mat Booth wrote:
eclipse-egit eclipse-epic eclipse-photran eclipse-phpeclipse eclipse-quickrex eclipse-shelled eclipse-slide
To the previous I would add: eclipse-cmake eclipse-moreunit eclipse-rpmstubby
Sounds good. I *think* I have commit access to the comps module so if someone wants to send a patch, I can try committing.
Andrew
How about the attached for a start, then.
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 20:41 +0000, Mat Booth wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Andrew Overholt <overholt redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 13:54 +0100, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
Mat Booth wrote:
eclipse-egit eclipse-epic eclipse-photran eclipse-phpeclipse eclipse-quickrex eclipse-shelled eclipse-slide
To the previous I would add: eclipse-cmake eclipse-moreunit eclipse-rpmstubby
Sounds good. I *think* I have commit access to the comps module so if someone wants to send a patch, I can try committing.
How about the attached for a start, then.
This looks good to me. Committed along with a few Mylyn changes I needed to do. I *think* any Fedora committer can fix this ... but maybe not? Either way, we're good for now. Thanks!
Andrew
java-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org