22 Feb
2022
22 Feb
'22
6:32 p.m.
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 12:29 PM Jilayne Lovejoy jlovejoy@redhat.com wrote:
I'm not sure who is authorized to be the "someone on the Fedora side" to give the OK, but I had a (re)read of the license and here are a few thoughts:
I think it meets the concept of free/open for Fedora as I understand it. The fact that it's been okay'd for inclusion in RHEL supports this, as I think the criteria for Fedora and RHEL (and any Red Hat open source project or product, perhaps?) is or should be aligned.
We need a license tag and the entry updated in the Licensing:Main wiki page that packagers reference to indicate this license is acceptable for Fedora.
-- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!