On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 12:29 PM Jilayne Lovejoy <jlovejoy(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I'm not sure who is authorized to be the "someone on the Fedora side" to
give the OK, but I had a (re)read of the license and here are a few thoughts:
I think it meets the concept of free/open for Fedora as I understand it. The fact that
it's been okay'd for inclusion in RHEL supports this, as I think the criteria for
Fedora and RHEL (and any Red Hat open source project or product, perhaps?) is or should be
aligned.
We need a license tag and the entry updated in the Licensing:Main wiki
page that packagers reference to indicate this license is acceptable for Fedora.
--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!