On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 3:44 PM Miroslav Suchý <msuchy(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I have a wish.
I am an product owner of Copr service. Currently, you can build in Copr only packages
with the same good licenses as you
can do in Fedora.
However, in Copr we do not need to be as strict as Fedora. Fedora does not allow license
which are ok to redistribute,
but you cannot modify it.
Do we have some example of license which is:
* forbidden in Fedora,
* the only reason for that is that it does not allow modification?
Can we have at least one such license allowed for Copr?
Is there a specific reason why this is needed? It doesn't sound like
there is some upstream software already under such a license that
someone wants to build in Copr.
Richard