I want to host some Fedora cloud images on a website for people to
download. These are constructed using a kickstart which just installs
@Core into a VM, as simple as it gets.
To comply with licensing, I was planning to point people who wanted
source back to Fedora, since we don't make any modifications. Also I
will publish the kickstart file and the short (20 line) shell script
that makes the images.
However the question arises if we need to do anything else from a
licensing / providing source / other legal point of view?
For example, is it a problem that Fedora deletes old SRPMs?
Is it a problem if we don't host the source ourselves?
Does the trademark exception cover our (non-commercial, community)
offering, assuming I comply with the required terms here?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Trademark_guidelines#Usage_That_Does...
Basically, in the words of Donald Rumsfeld, are there any "unknown
unknowns" I should be aware of?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and
build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW