[Fedora-legal-list] ii package license

[Petr Šabata]

Dear list,

I'm packaging the ii IRC client [1] for Fedora and the
package reviewer has expressed concerns about its license.
This software includes, in addition to the main MIT-licensed
code, the following script:

http://hg.suckless.org/ii/file/d163c8917af7/query.sh

I've decided to use "MIT and Public domain" as the package
license.  Would that be correct?

Thanks in advance,
Petr

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784589