-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 11:36 +0100, Giancarlo Niccolai wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
> Hello, I have submitted the Falcon package for review and
> inclusion at
> I will clear the rpmlint report later today.
> The Falcon Programming Language is released under FPLL: this is
> mainly an Apache2 license modified to extend the openness of the
> license to the embedding application and to the scripts. Here I
> am submitting the license to fedora-legal for approval.
I've passed this on to the FSF's lawyers for review.
Hello; I have reached an agreement with Debian about double licensing;
I will distribute Falcon there as GPL or FPLL as the user wish. I have
been provided with documentation and samples on how to accomplish this.
I didn't have news for some while from Fedora, witch accepted the
package with the exception of the license. If I repackage with double
licensing, would this clear the package for release?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----