Dne 10. 05. 22 v 16:56 Jilayne Lovejoy napsal(a):
On 5/10/22 1:56 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 10. 05. 22 v 9:06 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
>> I took the initiative and drafted
>>
>>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_1
>
>
> Nice! Thx.
>
>
>>
>> I did **not** set it as ready for wrangler yet. I welcome comments.
>> And feel free to edit it directly. Especially these who I put there
>> as proposal owners.
at the risk of sounding naive or clueless - what does "ready for
wrangler" mean?
>>
>> I would love to track all remaining work in the Scope section, so we
>> know what needs to be done and who is responsible. I am sure I
>> missed something there. Feel free to add it.
>
>
> I am honestly not sure about:
>
> > There will be Phase 2, where we identify the remaining packages and
> help them to migrate to the SPDX formula.
>
>
> 1) I think it will be risky to do this via automation.
only some of the ids could be done via automation in any case. many
will need a closer inspection
>
> 2) I don't think we will ever have the man power to do this.
I agree that some additional help or tooling process or hackfest or
... ??? would be good. need more brainstorming on this.
>
> 3) I don't think this should happen any time soon.
but we also don't want a period of using a mix of Fedora ids and SPDX
ids in Fedora to linger on for a long time as that would sort of
defeat the purpose of making the change. hence some planning around 1
and 2 would help perhaps
Well, yes, that is good point. Still not sure.
Actually, @Mirek shouldn't the Phase 2 be "SPDX is mandatory for new
packages from certain point in time" instead followed by Phase 3 with
complete migration to SPDX?
Vít