On 06/23/2018 11:57 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 23.6.2018 23:47, Till Hofmann wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm considering to package netperf . The license seems to be a custom
> HP license, but it is similar to BSD. I've attached the license text,
> which you can also find in the netperf repository .
> Is this license suitable for Fedora? If so, what should the license
> tag be?
The "for non-commercial purposes only" part in the license raises a red
flag. So I would say no (I'm not a representative of Fedora Legal, juts
Thanks for the feedback. Although the restriction "for non-commercial
purposes only" is only on distributing the software and documentation
and not on using it, I guess it is still a no-go? And I assume this also
holds for COPR?
My goal is to package flent, which is also distributed by Debian
), but it's not really of any use