Just confirming that the kickstart change worked.
I used something like:
part / --size 1600
Now everything's up and running (except X, but I'll figure that out on my own.)
Thanks again, Jeremy.
-->Seth
--- On Tue, 3/17/09, S'orlok Reaves <sorlok_reaves(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
From: S'orlok Reaves <sorlok_reaves(a)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Fedora-livecd-list] LiveUSB overlay size is smaller than expected
To: fedora-livecd-list(a)redhat.com
Date: Tuesday, March 17, 2009, 11:29 AM
Ah, that makes sense! Thanks for the tip; it would have
taken me ages to figure that one out on my own.
I'm on my laptop now; I'll re-build the image tomorrow and
let you know if it worked. Thanks again!
-->Seth
--- On Tue, 3/17/09, Jeremy Katz <katzj(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> From: Jeremy Katz <katzj(a)redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-livecd-list] LiveUSB overlay size
is smaller than expected
> To: sorlok_reaves(a)yahoo.com,
fedora-livecd-list(a)redhat.com
> Date: Tuesday, March 17, 2009, 10:42 AM
> On Tuesday, March 17 2009, S'orlok Reaves said:
> > I'm using the LiveUSB feature of the
LiveCDs,
> with the overlay feature to persist data. I have to
say,
> I'm really enjoying the portability. However, I'm
> unable to install all the packages I would like to,
due to a
> mysterious fact: the overlay file is way smaller than
I
> created it to be.
> [snip]
> > Running "df -h" on a clean boot of the usb
> shows me:
> > /dev/mapper/live-rw 741M (size)
715M(used)
> 20M(avail) (mounted as /)
> > ....and several tmpfs's I'm using for /var/run
> and yum's cache
>
> While the overlay is larger than this, the filesystem
size
> may be
> smaller. If you look at the kickstart config you
used to
> create your
> image, you probably have a rootfs size specified to be
on
> the smaller
> size
>
> Jeremy
--
Fedora-livecd-list mailing list
Fedora-livecd-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list