On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 13:44 +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis
<mavrothal(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> I'll go with Mikus on that.
> With at least 3 development streams some qualifier is needed in the naming. eg
os115x1/os115x15/os115py
+1 -- and remember to keep it all 8.3 :-)
Done: the next image will be called something like "os117py.img"
I've always wondered why the XO builds don't have a real name. Everyone
seems to generically refer to them as "OS". For some time, I've been
calling it "xoos", then I realized I was the only one and gave up.
Analogously, f11-xo1 is hardly pronounceable and f11-xo1-py is even
worse. Where's Steve Jobs when we need him?
--
// Bernie Innocenti -
http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs -
http://sugarlabs.org/