On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:08 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> > For the evince vs sugar-evince I suspect we need to
try and get the
>> > mainline evince split out into evince and evince-libs so that we
>> > can build sugar-evince against it similar to what we do with
>> > abiword and write (I think that's its name).
>>
>> Yep, sounds good.
>
> When I get a sec I'll look at what's required and file a RH bug for
> evince to see if we can't get the package split up.
BTW where does the current sugar-evince srpm live?
In koji.
Here is the diff against the corresponding evince version:
http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=users/dsd/sugar-evince;a=commitdiff;h=d9b354a...
There are some changes to the core evince source which means that it
will be more than just splitting up the F10 evince package. But that
will certainly be a step in the right direction.
Daniel