#6082: test
by Fedora Release Engineering
#6082: test
-----------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: churchyard | Owner: rel-eng@…
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: Fedora 21 Final | Component: other
Keywords: | Blocked By:
Blocking: |
-----------------------------+------------------------
testing, if I get e-mail
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6082>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
9 years, 3 months
[PATCH 0/2] Adjust mkbranch for automating git branch creation
by Pierre-Yves Chibon
Hi all,
Here is a proposed set of changes to the mkbranch script.
The first patch is just replacing all tabs in the file by spaces (simple
clean-up).
The second is the more important one. It drops the use/support of the
-s/--source argument.
This argument is currently used to specify from which point to branch when
creating a branch in the repo.
We argeed that instead of pointing to a specific branch (which would require
keeping a mapping somewhere of which branch should be branched from which other
branch), we would create the new branch by pointing them to the first commit in
the repository.
That's what this commit (hopefully) does :)
Thanks,
Pierre
Pierre-Yves Chibon (2):
Replace tab with spaces
Drop the -s/--source branch argument in mkbranch
roles/distgit/files/mkbranch | 102 +++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
--
1.9.3
9 years, 3 months
Re: #5963: Orphaned vulnerable packages in EPEL
by Fedora Release Engineering
#5963: Orphaned vulnerable packages in EPEL
------------------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: sparks | Owner: rel-eng@…
Type: task | Status: closed
Milestone: Fedora 20 Final | Component: epel
Resolution: fixed | Keywords: meeting
Blocked By: | Blocking:
------------------------------+-----------------------
Changes (by ausil):
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => fixed
Comment:
These have all been take care of, going forward packages should be
detected and cleaned up faster.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5963#comment:6>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
9 years, 3 months
#6080: epel7 branch for jsr-305
by Fedora Release Engineering
#6080: epel7 branch for jsr-305
--------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: richardfearn | Owner: rel-eng@…
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: epel
Keywords: | Blocked By:
Blocking: |
--------------------------+------------------------
Hi,
You recently created an epel7 branch for the jsr-305 package. (Thanks!)
While trying to build FindBugs for EPEL 7 using mock, I noticed that
jsr-305 was actually being pulled in from the 'base' repo. However that
repo is a CentOS repo, not a RHEL repo.
Having the epel7 branch might turn out to be very useful, since I might
need a newer version of jsr-305 for FindBugs. But assuming that there is a
jsr-305 package in RHEL, is it OK that there is now also a jsr-305 in EPEL
7?
(I seem to remember something on the wiki saying that EPEL branches would
not be created for packages that are already in RHEL, but I might be
mistaken.)
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6080>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
9 years, 3 months
#6079: Remove el6/epel7 branches for jFormatString/jsr-305/jcip-annotations/findbugs/findbugs-bcel
by Fedora Release Engineering
#6079: Remove el6/epel7 branches for jFormatString/jsr-305/jcip-
annotations/findbugs/findbugs-bcel
--------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: richardfearn | Owner: rel-eng@…
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: epel
Keywords: | Blocked By:
Blocking: |
--------------------------+------------------------
Hi
I recently requested el6 and epel7 branches for these five packages, with
the intention of getting FindBugs into EPEL. In hindsight I was far too
optimistic about being able to do that...
jsr-305 is built with Maven, and Maven isn't in EPEL 6.
findbugs depends on several Java libraries that aren't currently packaged
for EPEL.
To get FindBugs into EPEL will require several new packages to be added
first, and I don't have time to take that on.
Is it possible to undo the branch creation for these packages? I haven't
done any builds of them yet.
Sorry for wasting your time :-(
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6079>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
9 years, 3 months
[releng] check-latest-build: set new latest when found
by Dan Horák
commit 2c346aaca3c59625c55f014615a78624d1045e4a
Author: Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz>
Date: Thu Jan 8 10:48:27 2015 +0000
check-latest-build: set new latest when found
scripts/check-latest-build.py | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/scripts/check-latest-build.py b/scripts/check-latest-build.py
index 40ac0e0..77d6ad1 100755
--- a/scripts/check-latest-build.py
+++ b/scripts/check-latest-build.py
@@ -94,3 +94,6 @@ for latest in latest_builds:
if args.fix is True:
kojisession.tagBuildBypass(args.tag, b['nvr'], force=True)
print("retagged %s to %s" % (b['nvr'], args.tag))
+
+ latest = b
+ latest_evr = (str(latest['epoch']), latest['version'], latest['release'])
9 years, 3 months
[releng] check-latest-build: use koji api for retagging
by Dan Horák
commit fb523686868cdbf653a4451f75260b74e1801827
Author: Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz>
Date: Thu Jan 8 10:27:23 2015 +0000
check-latest-build: use koji api for retagging
scripts/check-latest-build.py | 15 ++++++++-------
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/scripts/check-latest-build.py b/scripts/check-latest-build.py
index 92a3db3..40ac0e0 100755
--- a/scripts/check-latest-build.py
+++ b/scripts/check-latest-build.py
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
# It can happen when bodhi pushes multiple builds of one package.
#
+import os
import argparse
import logging
log = logging.getLogger(__name__)
@@ -38,6 +39,10 @@ if args.arch is None:
else:
KOJIHUB = 'http://%s.koji.fedoraproject.org/kojihub' % (args.arch)
+# Should probably set these from a koji config file
+SERVERCA = os.path.expanduser('~/.fedora-server-ca.cert')
+CLIENTCA = os.path.expanduser('~/.fedora-upload-ca.cert')
+CLIENTCERT = os.path.expanduser('~/.fedora.cert')
def _rpmvercmp((e1, v1, r1), (e2, v2, r2)):
"""find out which build is newer"""
@@ -58,6 +63,7 @@ def _rpmvercmp((e1, v1, r1), (e2, v2, r2)):
kojisession = koji.ClientSession(KOJIHUB)
+kojisession.ssl_login(CLIENTCERT, CLIENTCA, SERVERCA)
if args.package == []:
latest_builds = sorted(kojisession.listTagged(args.tag, latest=True),
@@ -86,10 +92,5 @@ for latest in latest_builds:
if res == -1:
print("\t%s < %s" % (latest['nvr'], b['nvr']))
if args.fix is True:
- cmd = ["koji", "untag-build", args.tag, b['nvr']]
- print("running: " + " ".join(cmd))
- subprocess.check_call(cmd)
-
- cmd = ["koji", "tag-build", args.tag, b['nvr']]
- print("running: " + " ".join(cmd))
- subprocess.check_call(cmd)
+ kojisession.tagBuildBypass(args.tag, b['nvr'], force=True)
+ print("retagged %s to %s" % (b['nvr'], args.tag))
9 years, 3 months
#6077: el6 build can't find gluster dep for qemu-img
by Fedora Release Engineering
#6077: el6 build can't find gluster dep for qemu-img
----------------------+------------------------
Reporter: crobinso | Owner: rel-eng@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: epel
Keywords: | Blocked By:
Blocking: |
----------------------+------------------------
Trying to build vdsm for epel6 fails with a dependency issue when trying
to pull in qemu-img:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=600894
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8711/8548711/root.log
nirik did some magic, which widdled the error down to:
DEBUG util.py:366: Error: Package: 2:qemu-img-0.12.1.2-2.448.el6_6.x86_64
(build)
DEBUG util.py:366: Requires: libgfapi.so.0()(64bit)
That's via a vdsm scratch build.
qemu-img-0.12.1.2-2.448.el6_6.x86_64 is the latest qemu package in RHEL6.6
zstream, but for some reason the correct gluster packages aren't found, it
should be finding glusterfs-api-3.6.0.28-2.el6.x86_64.rpm which is the
version shipped with RHEL/Centos 6.6
nirik asked me to file this ticket since he ran out of ideas
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6077>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
9 years, 3 months
#6074: 2 Packages missing from mirrors
by Fedora Release Engineering
#6074: 2 Packages missing from mirrors
-----------------------------+-------------------
Reporter: limb | Owner: limb
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: Fedora 21 Final | Component: koji
Keywords: | Blocked By:
Blocking: |
-----------------------------+-------------------
eclipse-egit-3.5.3-1.fc21 is missing, due to eclipse-egit-3.5.2-1.fc21
being pushed at the same time. Retagged.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6074>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
9 years, 3 months
