November 2018 - rel-eng - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[releng] Issue #7768: Please create a f29-gnome side tag

by Kalev Lember

kalev reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` Hi, Please create a new f29-gnome side tag and build target. We'll use it for building GNOME megaupdates before submitting them to Bodhi. Thanks, Kalev `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7768

5 years, 6 months

2
4
0 / 0

[releng] PR #7935: Drop f27 container base image build

by Clement Verna

cverna opened a new pull-request against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` Drop f27 container base image build `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/pull-request/7935

5 years, 6 months

2
1
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7610: Review of "Remove glibc-langpacks-all from buildroot" Change

by Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek

zbyszek reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` Please see https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Changes/Remove_glibc-langpack.... I don't expect any releng work. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7610

5 years, 6 months

4
10
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7889: remove /pub/alt/atomic/testing directory on November 20th

by Dusty Mabe

dustymabe reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` * Describe the issue Remove the [/pub/alt/atomic/testing](https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/testing/) directory. It is no longer used. Don't do this before November 20th once we have done two releases of f29AH just to verify nothing is relying on this directory. * When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD) 2018-11-20 * When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD) * If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact? `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7889

5 years, 6 months

2
2
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7940: Add fedora-infra-srpm-macros to infra Koji tags

by Mikolaj Izdebski

mizdebsk reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` ### Describe the issue Fedora Infrastructure would like to implement custom dist tags for their specific builds as detailed in [fedora-infrastructure ticket #7384](https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7384). To achieve this we need adjustments to Koji tag and group configuration. Therefore please: * create package list entries for package `fedora-infra-srpm-macros` in tags `epel6-infra`, `epel7-infra`, `f27-infra`, `f28-infra`, `f29-infra` and `f30-infra`, * add package `fedora-infra-srpm-macros` to groups `build` and `srpm-build` in aforementioned tags. ### When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD) Earliest convenience. ### When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD) N/A ### If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact? Fedora Infrastructure won't be able to implement custom dist tags for their builds. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7940

5 years, 6 months

2
2
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7946: gftp epel7 branch error

by Gwyn Ciesla

limb reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` * Describe the issue I requested an epel7 branch for gftp. Something must have gone wrong when I processed it, because it doesn't exist. I re-requested it, and then it said PDC already had the branch, but pagure doesn't. * When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD) Soon-ish but not critical. * When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD) EL-7 EOL * If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact? No gftp for EL-7, failure to resolve BZ 1458497. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7946

5 years, 6 months

2
5
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7937: updates repo misses ibus-gtk3-1.5.19-9.fc29.i686

by Takao Fujiwara

fujiwara reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` * Describe the issue Regarding to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653181 , ibus-gtk3-1.5.19-9.fc29.i686 does not exist in https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/29/Everything/x86_6... * When do you need this? 2018/12/30 * When is this no longer needed or useful? * If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact? dnf update failed in multi lib desktop `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7937

5 years, 6 months

4
11
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7948: Unorphan python-flock

by Scott K Logan

cottsay reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` * Name of the package? python-flock * FAS username of the new maintainer? cottsay `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7948

5 years, 6 months

2
4
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7947: Unorphan python-os-client-config

by Alfredo Moralejo

amoralej reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` - Name of the package? python-os-client-config - FAS username of the new maintainer? amoralej `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7947

5 years, 6 months

2
2
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7942: Unorphan few packages

by Igor Gnatenko

ignatenkobrain reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` ### Name of the package? * `python-simplegeneric` * `chck` * FAS username of the new maintainer? `ignatenkobrain` * Any extra information? Some of my packages depend on them. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7942

5 years, 6 months

4
5
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

rel-eng November 2018