November 2018 - rel-eng - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[releng] Issue #7354: apitrace-libs.i686 version mismatches apitrace-libs.x86_64 on F27

by Sandro Mani

smani reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` On F27 the current version of apitrace is apitrace-7.1-7.fc27. On F27 x86_64 however, # dnf install --refresh apitrace-libs.i686 currently gives you apitrace-libs-7.1-7.fc27.i686 (note: -7 instead of -9). On the other hand, # dnf install --refresh apitrace-libs gives you apitrace-libs-7.1-9.fc27.x86_64 as expected. apitrace-libs is multilib whitelisted, but appears to be out of sync. See also #1541099. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7354

5 years, 3 months

2
2
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7316: variants-modular.xml & fedora-release*

by Langdon White

langdon reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` Once [#7227](https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7227) is complete, I wanted to confirm that: * We should continue to make PRs against [variants-modular.xml](https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/blob/master/f/variants-modular.xml) and file tickets here to get new modules added to the compose. * Should we file tickets here or use some other method to get changes to fedora-release* rpms? Specifically, we will need to include a system profile ([for example](https://github.com/sgallagher/semimodular_poc/blob/master/semimo...) and modify it as modules are added. /cc @sgallagh @psabata `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7316

5 years, 3 months

2
2
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7900: New side tag for rawhide llvm 7.0 ABI change.

by Tom Stellard

tstellar reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` * Describe the issue I need to break the ABI of libLLVM.so without a soname bump in order to fix an llvm bug[1]. I need a side-tag in order to rebuild all dependent packages without creating a disruption. [1] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39427 * When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD) 2018/11/01 * When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD) 2019/08/01 * If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact? Users will not be able to link programs compiled with clang against Fedora's llvm-libs package. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7900

5 years, 3 months

6
23
0 / 0

[releng] PR #7871: Edit the targets of newly branched release

by Mohan Boddu

mohanboddu opened a new pull-request against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` Edit the targets of newly branched release `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/pull-request/7871

5 years, 4 months

1
1
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7031: Should f27 and f27-build have different architectures?

by Kellin

kellin reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` $ koji taginfo f27 Tag: f27 [417] Arches: armv7hl i686 x86_64 ppc64 ppc64le aarch64 ^PGroups: appliance-build, build, livecd-build, livemedia-build, srpm-build Required permission: 'admin' Tag options: mock.package_manager : 'dnf' Inheritance: $ koji taginfo f27-build Tag: f27-build [425] Arches: aarch64 armv7hl i686 ppc64 ppc64le s390x x86_64 Groups: appliance-build, build, livecd-build, livemedia-build, srpm-build Required permission: 'admin' Tag options: This tag is a buildroot for one or more targets Current repo: repo#785431: 2017-09-14 21:09:29.969602 Targets that build from this tag: f27-candidate f27-rebuild f27-binutils-rebuild f27 Inheritance: 0 .... f27-override [424] `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7031

5 years, 4 months

4
6
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7664: Delete rawhide-repo-holder build target

by Mikolaj Izdebski

mizdebsk reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` * Describe the issue Presence of [rawhide-repo-holder](https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildtargetinfo?... build target in Koji makes kojira generate repos for [rawhide](https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taginfo?tagID=197) tag, which according to @puiterwijk is not used any longer. * When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD) earliest convenience * When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD) * If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact? Koji resources are wasted generating unneeded repos. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7664

5 years, 4 months

3
5
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7936: Changes/Ruby_2.6

by Vít Ondruch

vondruch reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` FYI, we are planning to introduce Ruby 2.6 into Fedora: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_2.6 We will be asking for side-tag after Christmas and should be done with the rebuild prior mass rebuild, but I assume we will open a separate ticket. Please let me know if you have any concerns. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7936

5 years, 4 months

2
4
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7604: F29 System-Wide Change: Remove Excessive Linking

by Igor Gnatenko

ignatenkobrain reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` Please review https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemoveExcessiveLinking change. P.S. I don't think that any actions from rel-eng are needed. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7604

5 years, 4 months

5
10
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7687: Change impact: Mass Python 2 Package Removal

by Miro Hrončok

churchyard reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` a check of an impact with Release Engineering is needed https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mass_Python_2_Package_Removal `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7687

5 years, 4 months

3
3
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7110: libtomcrypt missing from Koji f27 buildroot?

by Randy Barlow

bowlofeggs reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` Greetings! I've discovered that [Bodhi doesn't build in F27](https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22659036) as of recently, as libtomcrypt doesn't seem to be available in the buildroot: ``` - nothing provides libtomcrypt.so.0()(64bit) needed by python2-crypto-2.6.1-17.fc27.s390x ``` I [reported this](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505641) to the libtomcrypt maintainer, who pointed out that it seems to be tagged correctly. I then realized that I was able to install it in an f27 container as well: ``` $ sudo docker run --rm registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:27 dnf install python2-crypto -y ``` Is there maybe something wrong with the f27 buildroot that causes this issue? `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7110

5 years, 4 months

3
5
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

rel-eng November 2018