On Tue, May 5, 2015, at 05:18 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
correct. at the moment it is really unknown.
it = risk?
it = "traceability"?
at this point in the release
cycle I am extremely change adverse. I want to avoid anything that has the
potential to cause a slip in any way shape or form.
But...currently Atomic is non-blocking, and if somehow this change were
to break generating the installer, it's a matter of...something like the attached
patch?