On Tuesday, May 05, 2015 08:46:15 PM Colin Walters wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2015, at 08:35 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 05, 2015 06:19:23 PM Colin Walters wrote:
> > On Tue, May 5, 2015, at 05:18 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > correct. at the moment it is really unknown.
> >
> > it = risk?
> > it = "traceability"?
>
> Both
I am trying to understand how this identifier relates to "traceability"
(which is a term Matthew mentioned).
traceability in being able to take that name
and map it back to the image it
was installed from.
> we would deal with the failure as it happened. if it failed to
compose
> when
> the final RC compose completes then it owuld miss the boat for F22 and
> would be completely absent. we have an integrated process. so there is
> no do overs or makeups. If you are okay with risking missing F22
> altogether then we can do something.
I am OK with risking missing F22 altogether rather than ship with this
string.
> as I said earlier we can and should be looking now at what changes
>
> should be getting made for Fedora 23.
Then what was blocking applying this patch for F23?
two reasons, one, we do not make this as part of rawhide, and two we currently
have no way to enable this change without, it applying to f22 also.
Dennis