Re: Attempting to allow for a source of truth for Fedora release cycle information: releasestream
On Thu, 2021-02-11 at 09:55 +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
>
> So, what do folks think? Does this seem like a good idea? Should I go
> ahead with trying to get it deployed and onboard things to it? Any
> comments, ideas, potential problems? Thanks!
>
I am pretty sure you did :-) but have you looked at adding the missing
information to Bodhi ? Now that we have rawhide in Bodhi we should be able
to expose most the information needed.
I didn't look at that in any technical detail but conceptually it seems
kinda wrong to me. The problem with using any existing system is that
all existing systems are *for* something. Bodhi is for dealing with
updates. There's no reason why Bodhi would track, for instance, whether
34 is under a string freeze, right? Because Bodhi doesn't have anything
to do with translations. There are a zillion other 'states' that it
would be useful to have info on which aren't relevant to any *one*
existing system, and that's why to me it makes sense to have a separate
thing for that.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net