On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 01:38:15PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Paul W. Frields (stickster(a)gmail.com) said:
> > If it's wrong, 'we should update the methodology'. You asked for
feedback
> > on the schedule, not the methodology.
> >
> > Was this methodology ever posted in a FESCo or rel-eng meeting for public
> > review by the stakeholders? I don't recall it, but I could be wrong. So,
> > it really shouldn't be surprising that other people are surprised by the
> > output of this new methodology, when that output doesn't actually appear
> > to match what we've previously done.
>
> IIRC that page consolidates previous written work from previously
> existing pages, and the comments of rel-eng personnel. Is it really
> new, or the same information presented in a different format that
> makes it look new?
The entire 'schedule methodology' section was added on September 18,
according to the wiki history.
September 17 & 18, but if I read this right the meat came from these
pre-existing pages:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Time_based_release_schedule
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Schedule
--
Paul W. Frields
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - -
http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug