On 04/26/2011 11:18 AM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 03:56:26PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
systemd comes with extensive documentation and your typical response to all changes isn't applicable here. If you are going to claim lack of documentation, can you be more specific?
http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-man/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Systemd
That includes links to such "perls of wisdom" as http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken which in effect says: "I broke it and I totally do not care. Anyway, this is all your fault as you are stupid enough to run a system laid out not the way I like it." Why I am not surprised?
Did you read it? It actually says "I did not break it - it's been broken for a while in a number of different ways".