----- Original Message -----
On 21/02/13 01:11 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
----- Original Message -----
We discussed a few possible changes to the blocker bug meeting process at the QA meeting this week. It was agreed that I'd draft up these changes for list discussion. So here they are! Sent to test@ and devel@ as QA, devel and releng are the stakeholders in this process: I'm figuring releng folks are all subscribed to one list or the other.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_QA_SOP_blocker_bug_meetin... https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_QA_SOP_blocker_bug_proces...
As it did these moves during F18 cycle, it makes sense. Also I hope F19 won't be such beast as F18 (yeah, hope :D). With automatic blocker status for specific bug types, I think we are going the good direction! Thanks guys!
Thanks for the feedback, Jaro and others. As per the discussion at the meeting on Monday, I've gone ahead and put these changes into production. So everyone remember to use #fedora-blocker-review for the next blocker meeting :)
Thank you Adam!
R.
-- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test