On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 13:57 -0400, pmkellly@frontier.com wrote:
It's not about interpretation or not, it's just about a preference for this:
Test Steps
- Step 1
- Step 2
- Step 3
Expected Results
- Expected result 1
- Expected result 2
- Expected result 3
versus this:
Test Steps and Expected Results
- Step 1
- Expected result 1
- Step 2
- Expected result 2
- Step 3
- Expected result 3
Our current template really only handles the first style, if you want to do the second style you have to do some kind of 'hack' like kparal did. I'm just saying if the second style is clearly better for some test, we should probably add an alternative template or tweak the existing template to have a 'mode' which works better for that style.
Sorry for the misunderstanding. I think the second format would serve us best.
- Step 1
- Expected result 1
- Step 2
- Expected result 2
This makes the test case easier to read with lower chance of confusion.
I think there are cases where each works better, there's no harm in supporting both.