Latest rawhide reports do not list anything broken for openoffice.org but after recent updates I see "Package openoffice.org-core requires libxpcom.so". The later library a part of such packages like mozilla, firefox or thunderbird but these are 64-bit libraries while openoffice is a 32-bit application.
There is now mozilla-1.7.12-2.i386.rpm among x86_64 packages, which would install some 30 Megs of stuff, but it looks like that scripts /usr/bin/mozilla will conflict between i386 and x86_64 and besides with an attempt of (local)install, not to update, yum responds:
mozilla-1.7.12-2.i386.rpm: does not update installed package. Nothing to do
It looks like that if libxpcom.so is really needed than a reasonable thing to do would be to split it in a separate subpackage similar to mozilla-nss (which, BTW, supplies for each architecture two independent copies of libnssckbi.so; a bit much).
Do I miss something?
Michal
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 16:07 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
Latest rawhide reports do not list anything broken for openoffice.org but after recent updates I see "Package openoffice.org-core requires libxpcom.so". The later library a part of such packages like mozilla, firefox or thunderbird but these are 64-bit libraries while openoffice is a 32-bit application.
Yeah, the mozilla "xpcom" dependency snuck in, but shouldn't have. There will be another spin which will resolve this.
C.
-
Caolán McNamara -
Michal Jaegermann