pup-0.1.9-1
by Don Springall
Don't know if this will help but got the following while running pup from a
terminal which stalled after these messages:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/pup/pup/pup.py", line 569, in _apply
self._checkDeps()
File "/usr/share/pup/pup/pup.py", line 873, in _checkDeps
(result, msgs) = self.buildTransaction()
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/__init__.py", line 360, in
buildTransaction
(rescode, restring) = self.resolveDeps()
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/depsolve.py", line 254, in
resolveDeps
(checkdep, missing, conflict, errormsgs) = self._processReq(dep)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/depsolve.py", line 385, in
_processReq
requirementTuple, errormsgs)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/depsolve.py", line 518, in
_requiringFromInstalled
needpo = self.getPackageObject(needpkgtup)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/__init__.py", line 1327, in
getPackageObject
raise Errors.DepError, 'Package tuple %s could not be found in
packagesack' % str(pkgtup)
DepError: Package tuple ('libgcj', 'i386', '0', '4.0.2', '6') could not be
found in packagesack
>/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/__init__.py(1327)getPackageObject()
-> raise Errors.DepError, 'Package tuple %s could not be found in
packagesack' % str(pkgtup)
(Pdb)
18 years, 5 months
pup-0.1.9-1
by Don Springall
Pup seems to go missing sometimes while checking dependencies. For some
reason it seems to work when you select everything (showing you all the
missing dependencies in a list) but crashes sometimes when you select a
partial list. Cannot determine pattern for why or when it goes missing. No
messages to yum.log or dmesg about it. Anything I can turn on to help narrow
down why it is crashing ?
It would also help if the system log viewer listed yum as well. When I tried
the open tab under the log menu item log viewer crashed (version 2.13.2).
Log viewer also crashes on its own just sitting there minimized.
18 years, 5 months
X86_64 Test 1
by Sean Bruno
Did you folks get enough feedback on the X86_64 version of Test 1? I
haven't gotten around to install it yet(prolly won't till test 2).
Sean
18 years, 5 months
Re: rootkit?
by Andy Armstrong
Dan Hollis wrote:
> Do note that pam_abl is completely broken on x86_64.
> (pam_abl bug, not a fedora bug).
It's on my list but unfortunately I don't currently have an x86_64
machine to test on. If anyone has a spare box I could have ssh access
to that would be very helpful :)
--
Andy Armstrong, hexten.net
18 years, 5 months
Re: rootkit?
by Chasecreek Systemhouse
On 12/11/05, Craig White <craigwhite(a)azapple.com> wrote:
> > Whats the general removal procedure for this, and better yet, how did
> > they get in?
> ----
> it would seem that ssh, root allowed to login via password would be the
> magic combination of bad judgement...it's been so thoroughly discussed
> on this list as of late.
About three months ago I reported a box I admin'ed was accessed thru
DDoS on the ssh access port -- the sshd was hit 90,000 times a hour
and the attacker gained access. They didn't get to do much as the box
had no compiler, no Perl, and was locked up by SELinux. I made the
report to both openssh and to the RedHat ssh developers. I was
running FC4 with the then current patches up-to-date.
Anyhow... After they (the attacker, who arrived via S.America) spent
a few minutes trying to install a eBay spammer and a sendmail backdoor
-- both attempts failed -- they deleted some files and gave up. This
attack, access, and discovery all happened in less than a 5 hour
period. The attacker either was a novice or didn't care to cover
their tracks.
Now, before you say that ssh allowed root access - I can assure you
that root was not allowed to access the system -- not via ssh; only
via the local console. Since that attack I have reformatted the
drives and tossed out all the data and installed clean backups. I
have also limited - via cron -- when ssh is available for remote use;
hopefully that will reduce the window of opportunity.
I would say there is a ssh brute force hack floating around that has
not been documented yet; as such it is all Server admins best
interests to remain vigilant.
--
WC -Sx- Jones | http://ccsh.us/ | Open Source Consulting
18 years, 5 months
Enabling keyboard keys on X (Rawhide)
by Patrick
Hi all,
With FC4 on an Acer Ferrari 4000 I had some keys that did not work out
of the box and needed the changes below. When I tried to do the same
trick on Rawhide I saw that X has changed considerably. Anyone have some
hints how I make the changes below apply to the new X?
Thanks and regards,
Patrick
/etc/rc.c/rc.local:
/usr/bin/setkeycodes e033 159 e034 158 e06e 235 e074 236 e073 237 e025
238 e026 239 e027 138 e055 192
/usr/lib/X11/xkb/symbols/inet:
--- orig/inet 2005-12-07 18:25:57.488686750 +1100
+++ inet 2005-08-27 05:21:43.851837904 +1000
@@ -38,6 +38,28 @@
key <I5E> { [ XF86PowerOff ] };
};
+partial alphanumeric_keys
+xkb_symbols "ferrari4k" {
+ // From Alex Dubov <oakad(a)yahoo.com>
+ name[Group1]= "Acer Ferrari 4000 Keyboard";
+
+ key <I30> { [ XF86AudioRaiseVolume ] }; //Fn+Up
+ key <I2E> { [ XF86AudioLowerVolume ] }; //Fn+Down
+ key <I20> { [ XF86AudioMute ] }; //Fn+F8
+ key <I6C> { [ XF86Mail ] }; //"mail" button
+ key <I32> { [ XF86WWW ] }; //"Saturn" button
+ // Missing keycodes - set-up with setkeycodes
+ key <I71> { [ XF86Launch1 ] };
+ key <I72> { [ XF86Launch2 ] };
+ key <I73> { [ Help ] };
+ key <I74> { [ XF86Launch3 ] };
+ key <I75> { [ XF86Launch4 ] };
+ key <I79> { [ XF86Launch5 ] };
+ key <I5F> { [ XF86Sleep ] };
+ key <I69> { [ EuroSign ] };
+ key <I6A> { [ dollar ] };
+};
+
// Azona
/usr/lib/X11/xkb/symbols.dir:
*** orig/xorg 2005-08-06 20:45:18.000000000 +0300
--- xorg 2005-08-26 22:43:33.145794968 +0300
***************
*** 100,106 ****
! layout[4] = symbols
* = +pc/%l[4]%(v[4]):4
! ! $inetkbds = airkey acpi scorpius azonaRF2300 \
brother \
btc5113rf btc5126t btc9000 btc9000a btc9001ah btc5090\
cherryblue cherrybluea cherryblueb \
--- 100,106 ----
! layout[4] = symbols
* = +pc/%l[4]%(v[4]):4
! ! $inetkbds = airkey ferrari4k acpi scorpius azonaRF2300 \
brother \
btc5113rf btc5126t btc9000 btc9000a btc9001ah btc5090\
cherryblue cherrybluea cherryblueb \
/usr/lib/X11/xkb/rules/xorg.lst:
*** orig/xorg.lst 2005-08-06 20:45:18.000000000 +0300
--- xorg.lst 2005-08-26 22:44:57.177020280 +0300
***************
*** 21,26 ****
--- 21,27 ----
pc98 PC-98xx Series
abnt2 Brazilian ABNT2
airkey Acer AirKey V
+ ferrari4k Acer Ferrari 4000
acpi ACPI Standard
azonaRF2300 Azona RF2300 wireless Internet Keyboard
scorpius Advance Scorpius KI
/usr/lib/X11/xkb/rules/xorg.xml:
*** orig/xorg.xml 2005-08-06 20:45:18.000000000 +0300
--- xorg.xml 2005-08-26 22:45:56.259038448 +0300
***************
*** 184,189 ****
--- 184,195 ----
</model>
<model>
<configItem>
+ <name>ferrari4k</name>
+ <description>Acer Ferrari 4000</description>
+ </configItem>
+ </model>
+ <model>
+ <configItem>
<name>acpi</name>
<description>ACPI Standard</description>
<description xml:lang="cs">Standard ACPI</description>
18 years, 5 months
How to override non satisfied dependencies
by Roger Grosswiler
Hello,
Did anybody get out, which apps to exclude from update, so the
dependencies get satisfied?
i searched and searched, and somehow i have the feeling, that none of my
apps are concerned by this - perhaps i only was too tired... :-(
Ropg
18 years, 5 months
Firewire hosed
by RaXeT
I'm currently testing rawhide/devel FC5. Have found that my Sony DRX
710UL DVD-RW firewire drive isn't detected on kernels post
2.6.13-1.1532_FC5? Now if I change from
firewire connection to a USB connection on this device, it's detected.
Anyone know if this is a issue with kudzu, udev or the kernel?
18 years, 5 months
ACX100 -acx.ko module for TI ACX111 chipsets
by Don Springall
I am trying to get the acx module to work for my linksys WPC54G v2 wireless
card working. The module is currently in the MM tree only. It cannot seem to
find the firmware. I stuck the firmware in as /lib/firmware/TIACX111.BIN but
I still get this in dmesg:
acx: found ACX111-based wireless network card at 0000:07:00.0, irq:10,
phymem1:0x28020000, phymem2:0x28000000, mem1:0xd087c000, mem1_size:8192,
mem2:0xd0940000, mem2_size:131072
initial debug setting is 0x000A
using IRQ 10
requesting firmware image 'tiacx111c16'
acx: firmware image 'tiacx111c16' was not provided. Check your hotplug
scripts
requesting firmware image 'tiacx111'
acx: firmware image 'tiacx111' was not provided. Check your hotplug scripts
acx: reset_dev() FAILED
ACPI: PCI interrupt for device 0000:07:00.0 disabled
acx_pci: probe of 0000:07:00.0 failed with error -5
ndiswrapper uses the firmware from linksys which is
/lib/firmware/FwRad17.bin and /lib/firmware/FwRad16.bin
Does anyone have any experience getting this to work ?
18 years, 5 months
Re: Kernel 2.6.14-1.1719 to 2.6.14-1.1740
by Matthew Carter
Hi Guys
Updated my version of Udev to the patched version using the
instructions, now when I boot on to the latest kernel I get:
Starting Udev:
And then nothing, udev doesnt start with a newer kernel (1743),
however it still works fine with the older kernel (1719). Any ideas of
that else I can try to help debug?
Matt
> Matt Carter wrote:
> > Hi Guy
> >
> > Currently I have one working kernel on my system 2.6.14-1.1715, on the
> > other Kernels I get Udev freeze. I added a "set -x" and "echo $1" to
> > my rc.sysinit to see what was causing the hang. I got this:
> >
> > +echo floppy
> > floppy
> > modprobe floppy
> >
> > This is when it hangs, my laptop has no floppy or floppy controller.
> > So i "#" out modprobe floppy from the rc.sysinit script and it got a
> > little further, but then it froze on:
> >
> > +echo echi-hcd
> > ehci+hcd
> > +modprobe ehci-hcd
> >
> > Any one else having problems like this? I have been reporting it on
> > bugzilla (174270) wondered if anyone else had any luck fixing the
> > issue?
> >
> > Btw the laptop is a Pentium M, Intel 915 Chipset (Sony S Series
> > Laptop). Is there anything else I could try?
> >
> > Matt
> >
>
> This could be udevd running in parallel and doing stuff..
> Could you
> # rpmbuild --rebuild ftp://people.redhat.com/harald/udev/udev-075-5.src.rpm
> install the rpm and reboot?
> This udev version has a patch, which waits until udevd has finished
> replaying the uevents. So we can debug it a little better.
18 years, 5 months
