rawhide report: 20090424 changes
by Fedora compose checker
Compose started at Fri Apr 24 06:15:03 UTC 2009
New package nautilus-cd-burner
Easy to use CD burning for Gnome
Updated Packages:
acpid-1.0.8-4.fc11
------------------
* Tue Apr 21 2009 Zdenek Prikryl <zprikryl(a)redhat.com> - 1.0.8-4
- Fixed CVE-2009-0798 (too many open files DoS)
authconfig-5.4.10-1.fc11
------------------------
* Thu Apr 23 2009 Tomas Mraz <tmraz(a)redhat.com> - 5.4.10-1
- update PAM configuration when updating from old authconfig versions (#495924)
bluez-4.37-1.fc11
-----------------
* Thu Apr 23 2009 - Bastien Nocera <bnocera(a)redhat.com> - 4.37-1
- Update to 4.37
bouncycastle-1.43-1.fc11
------------------------
* Mon Apr 20 2009 Orcan Ogetbil <oget [DOT] fedora [AT] gmail [DOT] com> - 1.43-1
- Import Bouncy Castle 1.43.
* Sat Apr 18 2009 Orcan Ogetbil <oget [DOT] fedora [AT] gmail [DOT] com> - 1.42-3
- Don't build AOT bits. The package needs java1.6
bouncycastle-mail-1.43-1.fc11
-----------------------------
* Mon Apr 20 2009 Orcan Ogetbil <oget [DOT] fedora [AT] gmail [DOT] com> - 1.43-1
- Import Bouncy Castle 1.43.
* Sat Apr 18 2009 Orcan Ogetbil <oget [DOT] fedora [AT] gmail [DOT] com> - 1.42-3
- Don't build AOT bits. The package needs java1.6
* Sat Apr 18 2009 Orcan Ogetbil <oget [DOT] fedora [AT] gmail [DOT] com> - 1.42-4
- Rebuild
e2fsprogs-1.41.4-8.fc11
-----------------------
* Wed Apr 22 2009 Eric Sandeen <sandeen(a)redhat.com> 1.41.4-7
- Fix ext4 resize issues (#496982)
* Wed Apr 22 2009 Eric Sandeen <sandeen(a)redhat.com> 1.41.4-8
- Fix support for external journals
gcc-4.4.0-1
-----------
* Thu Apr 23 2009 Jakub Jelinek <jakub(a)redhat.com> 4.4.0-1
- update from gcc-4_4-branch
- GCC 4.4.0 release
- PRs libstdc++/39802, c++/39639, c/39855, rtl-optimization/39762,
testsuite/39781, tree-optimization/39824
- fix up DSE (PR middle-end/39794)
- debuginfo fixes for VLA and nested/contained functions (#459374)
- improve -ftree-switch-conversion optimization if the constant is the
same in all cases
* Mon Apr 20 2009 Jakub Jelinek <jakub(a)redhat.com> 4.4.0-0.35
- update from gcc-4_4-branch
- PRs middle-end/39804, target/39678, target/39767, tree-optimization/39675,
tree-optimization/39764
generic-logos-11.0.0-1.fc11
---------------------------
* Wed Apr 22 2009 Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> - 11.0.0-1
- updates for Fedora 11
gnome-media-2.26.0-3.fc11
-------------------------
* Thu Apr 23 2009 - Bastien Nocera <bnocera(a)redhat.com> - 2.26.0-3
- Don't show debug when disabling the debug output (#493138)
gnome-system-monitor-2.26.1-2.fc11
----------------------------------
* Thu Apr 23 2009 Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> - 2.26.1-2
- Fix sensitivity of menu items (#496860)
gnote-0.2.0-1.fc11
------------------
* Thu Apr 23 2009 Rahul Sundaram <sundaram(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.2.0-1
- new upstream release
gtk2-2.16.1-3.fc11
------------------
* Wed Apr 22 2009 Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> - 2.16.1-3
- Don't open double browser windows from about dialog
highlight-2.8-3.fc11
--------------------
* Mon Apr 20 2009 Jochen Schmitt <Jochen herr-schmitt de> 2.8-1
- New upstream release
* Mon Apr 20 2009 Jochen Schmitt <Jochen herr-schmitt de> 2.8-3
- Adding GUI subpackage
ifstatus-1.1.0-5.fc11
---------------------
* Wed Apr 22 2009 Adam Miller <maxamillion [AT] gmail.com> - 1.1.0-5
- Added CXXFLAGS and CXFLAGS to resolve debuginfo sources issue
krb5-auth-dialog-0.8-4.fc11
---------------------------
* Thu Apr 23 2009 Matthias Clasen <mclasen@redhatcom> - 0.8-4
- Don't show bubbles before the icon is there
- Use the same invisible char as the rest of the world
ltsp-5.1.71-1.fc11
------------------
* Thu Apr 23 2009 Warren Togami <wtogami(a)redhat.com> - 5.1.71-1
- Bug #497177 Fix pulseaudio daemon launch on clients
- Fedora 11 points to final mirrorlists instead of rawhide
moin-1.8.2-2.fc11
-----------------
* Wed Apr 22 2009 Ville-Pekka Vainio <vpivaini AT cs.helsinki.fi> 1.8.2-2
- Fix CVE-2008-0781 with two patches from upstream
mono-2.4-19.fc11
----------------
* Wed Apr 15 2009 Toshio Kuratomi <toshio(a)fedoraproject.org> 2.4-18
- Enable bootstrap code and ppc64. If this succeeds we'll build -19 right
afterwards with bootstrap code turned off.
Remember: you can't merge the ppc64 enabling to older branches without first
bootstrapping once.
* Wed Apr 15 2009 Toshio Kuratomi <toshio(a)fedoraproject.org> 2.4-19
- And turn off bootstrapping and make sure it rebuilds on all platforms.
ninvaders-0.1.1-3.fc11
----------------------
* Tue Apr 21 2009 Adam Miller <maxamillion [AT] gmail.com> - 0.1.1-3
- Patched Makefile to include $RPM_OPT_FLAGS to fix debuginfo issue
numpy-1.3.0-4.fc11
------------------
* Fri Apr 17 2009 Jon Ciesla <limb(a)jcomserv.net> 1.3.0-3
- Moved linalg, fft back to main package.
* Fri Apr 17 2009 Jon Ciesla <limb(a)jcomserv.net> 1.3.0-4
- EVR bump for pygame chainbuild.
rhythmbox-0.12.0.92-1.fc11
--------------------------
* Wed Apr 22 2009 - Bastien Nocera <bnocera(a)redhat.com> - 0.12.0.92-1
- Update to 0.12.0.92
seahorse-plugins-2.26.1-2.fc11
------------------------------
* Wed Apr 22 2009 Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> - 2.26.1-2
- Make seahorse-agent clean up its tempdir
system-config-bind-4.0.12-2.fc11
--------------------------------
* Thu Apr 23 2009 Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik(a)redhat.com> - 4.0.12-2
- dnssec workaround (rhbz#496017)
valgrind-3.4.1-2
----------------
* Wed Apr 22 2009 Jakub Jelinek <jakub(a)redhat.com> 3.4.1-2
- redirect x86_64 ld.so strlen early (#495645)
xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.7.0-2.fc11
-------------------------------
* Thu Apr 23 2009 Adam Jackson <ajax(a)redhat.com> 2.7.0-2
- Add intel-gpu-tools subpackage
Summary:
Added Packages: 1
Removed Packages: 0
Modified Packages: 25
Broken deps for i386
----------------------------------------------------------
nssbackup-0.2-0.2.rc7.fc10.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.5
python-arm4-1.1-3.fc10.i386 requires libpython2.5.so.1.0
python-arm4-1.1-3.fc10.i386 requires python(abi) = 0:2.5
sems-ivr-1.1.0-5.fc10.i386 requires libpython2.5.so.1.0
sems-python-1.1.0-5.fc10.i386 requires libpython2.5.so.1.0
sems-xmlrpc2di-1.1.0-5.fc10.i386 requires libssl.so.7
Broken deps for x86_64
----------------------------------------------------------
nssbackup-0.2-0.2.rc7.fc10.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.5
python-arm4-1.1-3.fc10.x86_64 requires libpython2.5.so.1.0()(64bit)
python-arm4-1.1-3.fc10.x86_64 requires python(abi) = 0:2.5
sems-ivr-1.1.0-5.fc10.x86_64 requires libpython2.5.so.1.0()(64bit)
sems-python-1.1.0-5.fc10.x86_64 requires libpython2.5.so.1.0()(64bit)
sems-xmlrpc2di-1.1.0-5.fc10.x86_64 requires libssl.so.7()(64bit)
Broken deps for ppc
----------------------------------------------------------
fedora-ksplice-0.5-3.fc11.noarch requires ksplice
nssbackup-0.2-0.2.rc7.fc10.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.5
python-arm4-1.1-3.fc10.ppc requires libpython2.5.so.1.0
python-arm4-1.1-3.fc10.ppc requires python(abi) = 0:2.5
sems-ivr-1.1.0-5.fc10.ppc requires libpython2.5.so.1.0
sems-python-1.1.0-5.fc10.ppc requires libpython2.5.so.1.0
sems-xmlrpc2di-1.1.0-5.fc10.ppc requires libssl.so.7
Broken deps for ppc64
----------------------------------------------------------
cabal2spec-0.12-1.fc11.noarch requires ghc > 0:6.10.1-7
fedora-ksplice-0.5-3.fc11.noarch requires ksplice
nssbackup-0.2-0.2.rc7.fc10.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.5
python-arm4-1.1-3.fc10.ppc64 requires libpython2.5.so.1.0()(64bit)
python-arm4-1.1-3.fc10.ppc64 requires python(abi) = 0:2.5
sems-ivr-1.1.0-5.fc10.ppc64 requires libpython2.5.so.1.0()(64bit)
sems-python-1.1.0-5.fc10.ppc64 requires libpython2.5.so.1.0()(64bit)
sems-xmlrpc2di-1.1.0-5.fc10.ppc64 requires libssl.so.7()(64bit)
15 years, 1 month
gcc-4.4 optimizations
by Neal Becker
I saw this on gcc devel ML:
------------
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, David Ronis wrote:
> >From the info pages it seems that the new optimizations,
> -floop-interchange, -floop-strip-mine, and -floop-block, are NOT turned
> on when -O3 is specified. Is this correct and if so, why aren't they?
Because the behavior of -O3 must not depend on whether optional libraries
are linked into GCC, and we did not decide to make PPL and CLooG required
to build GCC, so -O3 cannot enable any optimizations using optional
libraries.
Joseph S. Myers
joseph(a)codesourcery.com
-------------
Does our gcc-4.4 have these optional libs?
15 years, 1 month
yum update: Fatal error, run database recovery ??
by sean darcy
On F11 beta:
yum update
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit
rpmdb: Thread/process 3935/140267357374192 failed: Thread died in
Berkeley DB library
error: db4 error(-30974) from dbenv->failchk: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal
error, run database recovery
error: cannot open Packages index using db3 - (-30974)
error: cannot open Packages database in /var/lib/rpm
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/yum", line 29, in <module>
yummain.user_main(sys.argv[1:], exit_code=True)
File "/usr/share/yum-cli/yummain.py", line 309, in user_main
errcode = main(args)
File "/usr/share/yum-cli/yummain.py", line 157, in main
base.getOptionsConfig(args)
File "/usr/share/yum-cli/cli.py", line 187, in getOptionsConfig
self.conf
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/__init__.py", line 649, in
<lambda>
conf = property(fget=lambda self: self._getConfig(),
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/__init__.py", line 239, in
_getConfig
self._conf = config.readMainConfig(startupconf)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/config.py", line 794, in
readMainConfig
yumvars['releasever'] = _getsysver(startupconf.installroot,
startupconf.distroverpkg)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/config.py", line 867, in
_getsysver
idx = ts.dbMatch('provides', distroverpkg)
TypeError: rpmdb open failed
And this didn't fix it:
rpm --rebuilddb
rpmdb: Thread/process 3935/140267357374192 failed: Thread died in
Berkeley DB library
error: db4 error(-30974) from dbenv->failchk: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal
error, run database recovery
error: cannot open Packages index using db3 - (-30974)
I'll file a bug, but how can I fix this in the meantime?
sean
15 years, 1 month
Testing needed for dual boot systems
by Christopher Beland
Doing a bit of grub triage, I found several people not seeing non-Fedora
operating systems in their boot menus. Some of these bugs were filed
against grub, but should these really be considered anaconda bugs? Or
is it reasonable to request as a future feature that grub detect other
operating systems itself?
If you have another operating system installed (or are willing to do
so), the anaconda maintainer has requested more testing to see if these
bugs are fixed. It would be useful to see if you can reproduce any of
these bugs in the version reported and in Fedora 11 beta or later.
Thanks!
Beland
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464214
[anaconda] After installation, grub will only boot to Fedora, and has no
entry for Windows Vista.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334701
[grub] GRUB does not include other OSes in boot loader menu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452545
[grub] GRUB intolerant of pre-existing Ubuntu and Debian installations.
[closed as dup of 334701, but has replication instructions]
15 years, 1 month
Rawhide 32 bit network installs broken.
by Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
Responding to the call to test Rawhide on lesser machines, I made
a 32 bit boot.iso disk and attempted a network install. Things
proceeded smoothly until Anaconda choked on one of the
Packages - network manager config or some such. I rsynced
just now and tried to install 32 bit Rawhide on another machine
using pxeboot. Same results but it choked on a different package.
A new pxeboot network install of 64 rawhide installed on that second
machine without problems. This appears to be a 32 bit problem.
--
Chuck Forsberg caf(a)omen.com www.omen.com 503-614-0430
Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications
Omen Technology Inc "The High Reliability Software"
10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231 FAX 629-0665
15 years, 1 month
What happened to rawhide infrastructure (mirrors)?
by Michal Jaegermann
I happen to be located in _western_ Canada. All of sudden, today,
the only mirrors which rawhide decides to pick up for me are only in
Europe or across Pacific. Here is 'timedhosts.txt', sorted by time
ranking, I ended up with:
ftp.tudelft.nl 0.171518087387
ftp.isu.edu.tw 0.192414999008
alviss.et.tudelft.nl 0.192511081696
fedora.uib.no 0.220848083496
ftp.upjs.sk 0.221509933472
ftp.fi.muni.cz 0.228055953979
mirrors.nl.eu.kernel.org 0.23015499115
ftp.linux.cz 0.230855941772
ftp.df.lth.se 0.238596916199
ftp.jaist.ac.jp 0.253711938858
mirror.karneval.cz 0.253931045532
mirror.yandex.ru 0.283488035202
ftp6.linux.cz 99999999999
mirrors.se.eu.kernel.org 99999999999
I guess that only servers from India are missing in this picture.
The real problem is that transfer rates for most of these
range for me between 10 and 20 kB/sec (yes, you read that correctly)
and if I am patient enough to wait then eventually ftp.tudelft.nl,
for example, would tell me "No packages to update" if earlier "HTTP
Error 404: Not Found" was not returned on an attempt to retrieve
metadata.
Somebody got way too smart with geocoding?
Michal
15 years, 1 month
Re: something special with AMD ?
by Arne Chr. Jorgensen
If I had asked: something special with 486 ?
- assuming are running .i386 code, I would have expected someone to
mention memory instructions, and such.
- the context here are the busses and protocols.
my indirect question: "Do they know something I don't"?
( No response, not understanding, does answer something )
//ARNE
15 years, 1 month
Rawhide install from CD is really unacceptably slow
by Tom Lane
I'm trying to install yesterday's rawhide onto an older x86 machine,
and I'm just astonished and disgusted by how creakingly slow anaconda
is. For instance, during the partition-setup step it takes close to
20 seconds to pop up any of the edit-partition dialog boxes, during
which the CD drive is constantly busy. I could understand it having
to swap in some code from the CD the first time, but each dialog box
takes the same unreasonable amount of time. On many of the pages it's
taken several seconds even for the cursor to follow mouse movement.
I'm still waiting for the "checking dependencies" step, but every part
of the process has been just as bad.
I installed Fedora 10 on this same machine just last week, and I don't
recall it being an unpleasant experience. Rawhide seems to be an order
of magnitude slower.
Somebody's really dropped the ball on performance here somewhere.
It's difficult to know which component to blame though; any ideas?
regards, tom lane
15 years, 1 month
PolicyKit.IsProcessAuthorized
by Michael Wagner
Dear list,
while trying to track down an issue with gnome-lirc-properties
(#496182), I was wondering why the following command failed:
bus-send --system --dest=org.freedesktop.PolicyKit --print-reply
--type=method_call / org.freedesktop.PolicyKit.IsProcessAuthorized
string:'org.freedesktop.policykit.read' uint32:$$ boolean:true
Any ideas?
Greetings,
Michael
15 years, 1 month
Re: a draft-bugzilla-entry proposal ?
by Arne Chr. Jorgensen
>
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> We've actually had a similar proposal (000_Unknown_Component) bouncing
> around for a few weeks now, but haven't had a final decision on it. I
> like your refinements to the idea in theory, but I'm not sure they can
> be made to work in practice - Bugzilla doesn't necessarily have the
> capacity to do all those things.
>
> Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
> Instead of defaulting a component, Bugzilla should not select any
> component. If you hit "commit" you will get an error about not selecting
> a component. However, would this lead people to just randomly select a
> component?
>
> Christopher Beland wrote:
>
> That's the problem; sometimes people just pick the one that is
> alphabetically first.
>
>
> > What if ??
> > - the very first package had a name "A_Draft" with some info.
The first letter ( maybe more needed ) in the proposal, was to have it
become the alphabetically first package.
Some yellow help text, or full name of the package did seem to appear,
and this should inform that it is a "fictive" package, what ever is suitable
to make it clear.
You receive a notification as usual in the mail if you have made an entry.
For this particular "fictive package", you are informed that you have to
select a correctly "real package" and if possible, some included guidance
as, for example: search the other bugs filed it.
Further: if you don't edit the package name, your temporary entry will
be deleted in a number of days.
----------------
The idea was to make it easier to concentrate on what you have discovered,
and start filing. The long list of packages and initial problems, will discourage
most from making any entry. That "this" entry will not stay permanent may also
be a relief. You can do a trial run.
On the other side, perhaps it may give some indication of how many would try to file
a bug-report, but is having a second thought.
my 2 cents..
//ARNE
15 years, 1 month
