December 2010 - test - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora QA] #134: Clarify the ISO to USB tests

by fedora-badges

#134: Clarify the ISO to USB tests -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: rhe | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Test Review | Version: Keywords: | -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- We've heard many users installing by writing ISO to USB drive and having problems about it. So it's better to have a clear story from anaconda or whoever on what exactly is supported in terms of writing the DVD image to USB, and what isn't. It would be good to clear it up and add some specific install validation tests for it. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/134> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

9 years, 6 months

2
14
0 / 0

[Fedora QA] #79: Add firstboot release criteria

by fedora-badges

#79: Add firstboot release criteria ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ Reporter: jlaska | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Wiki | Version: Keywords: retrospective | ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ = problem = See [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=574596 RHBZ#574596 - Smolt does not run at firstboot] = analysis = We don't have a way to know what firstboot modules are expected, we need to document this as release criteria, or write a test to report the issue (for details, see RHBZ #574596). = enhancement recommendation = The release criteria do not include what image:Package-x-generic-16.pngfirstboot modules are intended for Fedora. Often, firstboot some modules are missing or disabled, and we don't notice or know whether this is a blocker. Recommend clarifying the use cases of firstboot in the release criteria. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/79> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

9 years, 6 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Fedora QA] #116: Clarify https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts to say that explicit Conflicts: are acceptable

by fedora-badges

#116: Clarify https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts to say that explicit Conflicts: are acceptable ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: adamwill | Owner: rhe Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Wiki | Version: Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- = bug description = Please update the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts test case to clarify that explicit Conflicts: tags are okay. = bug analysis = The relevant release criterion is "No file conflicts or unresolved package dependencies during a media-based (CD/DVD) install". The term "file conflicts" here is important. I believe it's intended to mean that only cases where the files in two packages conflict, but there is no explicit Conflicts: tag in the packages. Where the conflict is properly marked in the packages with Conflicts: tags, this should not be considered an infringement of the criterion. = fix recommendation = Change expected results: 2. No file conflicts were detected for packages included in the media kit, unless the conflicting packages also have explicit Conflicts: tags -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/116> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

9 years, 8 months

1
19
0 / 0

[Fedora QA] #84: Define install matrix baseline

by fedora-badges

#84: Define install matrix baseline ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ Reporter: jlaska | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Wiki | Version: Keywords: retrospective | ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ = problem = * We almost didn't find [http://bugzilla.redhat.com/578633 RHBZ#578633 - Unable to enter passphrase to unlock encrypted disk partitions] * When re-using test results from a previous test run, it's possible to include results for tests that should be re-tested. This would be bad. = analysis = * F-13 Beta candidate#3 didn't include the correct version of ''plymouth'' (see RHBZ #578633). * Since it was Beta#3 and not much was supposed to change from Beta#2, some test results from the previous Beta#2 candidate were carried forward. * Thankfully, QA found the problem before release while running the QA:Testcase_Anaconda_autopart_(encrypted)_install test. = enhancement recommendation = * Establish better guidelines about which test results can be carried forward from one candidate to the next (this isn't easy). Or perhaps, establish a subset of tests that all respins must undergo. * Perhaps link to, or document at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Installation_validation_testing -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/84> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

9 years, 8 months

1
6
0 / 0

[Fedora QA] #86: Add test coverage for text-mode upgrade

by fedora-badges

#86: Add test coverage for text-mode upgrade ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ Reporter: jlaska | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Wiki | Version: Keywords: retrospective | ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ = problem = See [http://bugzilla.redhat.com/590823 RHBZ#590823 - Text-mode upgrade fails when installing new bootloader -- KeyError: 'bootloader'] = analysis = Some tests in the [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test install test matrix] involve user interface components in both text-mode and graphical-mode (native or VNC). One such bug (RHBZ #590823) involved a problem found only during text-mode upgrades to Fedora 13. The text-mode upgrade screen shows different options thanenhancement recommendation = = enhancement recommendation = I'm hesitant to recommend specific text-mode tests for each user interface element that differs in text-mode and graphical-mode (it would be exhaustive but unachievable). As a catch-all, testing a text-mode install is included in the current matrix. Is there something small that can be done to cover the gap? 1. Perhaps adding a text-mode upgrade test case to the install matrix, or ... 2. Adding variations to the existing upgrade tests [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_Upgrade_Update_Bootlo... QA:Testcase_Anaconda_Upgrade_Update_Bootloader] and [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_Upgrade_Skip_Bootloader QA:Testcase_Anaconda_Upgrade_Skip_Bootloader] to also test text-mode, or ... 3. <insert better idea here> -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/86> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

9 years, 8 months

1
11
0 / 0

[Fedora QA] #158: Proposed Test Day - l10n/i18n test day

by fedora-badges

#158: Proposed Test Day - l10n/i18n test day ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 15 Component: Test Day | Version: Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- As discussed with Igor, this test day will be hosted on 2011-03-03. [[BR]] Igor, have you figured out which features/areas you want to target on? Do you plan to use the l10n template and specific test results page for it or the formatted wiki test day result page as before? [[BR]] Thanks. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/158> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

9 years, 11 months

1
32
0 / 0

[Fedora QA] #156: F15 Graphics Test Week

by fedora-badges

#156: F15 Graphics Test Week ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: adamwill | Owner: adamwill Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 15 Component: Test Day | Version: Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- We should have a Graphics Test Week for F15, as usual. I will organize it. For this cycle, we should develop a test case for GNOME Shell functionality, and also use this test case during the GNOME 3 Test Days. We should also have it slightly earlier this year, to allow extra time if major issues with GNOME Shell transpire. So I'm looking at the March 22-24 slot for this. I'll pencil it in there. Pages will be: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-03-22_Nouveau https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-03-23_Radeon https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-03-24_Intel (not up yet). -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/156> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

10 years

1
10
0 / 0

[Fedora QA] #157: F15 Xfce Test Day

by fedora-badges

#157: F15 Xfce Test Day ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: adamwill | Owner: adamwill Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 15 Component: Test Day | Version: Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- We should have an Xfce Test Day for F15, especially for major new release 4.8. Kevin, Christoph and I will organize this together. Pencilled in for 2011-02-17. Page would be: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-02-17_Xfce -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/157> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

10 years

1
4
0 / 0

[Fedora QA] #140: Proventester Mentor Request

by fedora-badges

#140: Proventester Mentor Request -----------------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: mrjfont | Owner: Type: proventester request | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version: Keywords: | -----------------------------------------+---------------------------------- Hi, I am requesting a mentor in order to join this group. I am looking forward to make contributions in order to have a final release of Fedora 14. Thank you; J. Font Fedora Project Contributor Bug Zapper, Triager. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/140> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

10 years

1
3
0 / 0

[Fedora QA] #159: Network Device Naming Test Day

by fedora-badges

#159: Network Device Naming Test Day ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ Reporter: shyamiyerdell | Owner: narendra_k(a)dell.com Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 15 Component: Test Day | Version: Keywords: | ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ This test day is to ensure that we have a sane solution to the NIC Naming problem described here http://linux.dell.com/files/presentations/Linux_Plumbers_Conf_2010/matt- domsch-network-device-naming.pdf This is being solved in biosdevname, udev and the installer. http://www.spinics.net/lists/fedora-devel/msg147124.html Testcases to come. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/159> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

10 years, 1 month

1
29
0 / 0

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

test December 2010