On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:19:25PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 12:18 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 03:56:26PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > systemd comes with extensive documentation and your typical response to
> > all changes isn't applicable here. If you are going to claim lack of
> > documentation, can you be more specific?
> >
> >
http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-man/
> >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Systemd
>
> That includes links to such "perls of wisdom" as
>
http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken
> which in effect says: "I broke it and I totally do not care. Anyway,
> this is all your fault as you are stupid enough to run a system
> laid out not the way I like it." Why I am not surprised?
Um. It seems like you failed to read the five points at the bottom.
Yes, I read them. Nice excuses. They do not change reality.
Michal