On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 23:22 -0500, Jeff Raber wrote:
On 06/18/2010 01:15 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I want to keep to the 'Test Day' because the concurrency aspect - having everyone in IRC, including a developer to give a very fast feedback/fix loop - is one of the key features, and you can't maintain that over a period longer than a day.
However, I do agree in one way: we can certainly make use of testing done outside of the exact 'day', and we should make sure to always communicate that. I try to do so when talking about Test Days and when making pages for them, but any ways we can be even more explicit about this would be great:)
My thoughts:
Thanks for the feedback, Jeff!
- The "Arriving after the date above?" admon on [1] & [2] work well to
deliver the message about testing after the 'day'. Consider using this same admon on future test day pages.
Indeed. I should make sure it's in the template page, actually. Thanks.
- Consider adding something similar to the 'Fedora_$REL_test_days' [3]
and 'Test_Days' [4] pages.
Also a good idea.
- Calling it a Test _Day_ sure makes it sound like it is limited to a
single 24hour period. Maybe this is a marketing problem, is there a better name?
If there is, I haven't been able to think of it :(. As I said, the problem is it cuts both ways; the 'day' concept has good connotations as well as bad ones. I haven't been able to come with anything that keeps the good while cutting the bad. Suggestions gratefully received!