On 04/26/2011 11:18 AM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 03:56:26PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> systemd comes with extensive documentation and your typical response to
> all changes isn't applicable here. If you are going to claim lack of
> documentation, can you be more specific?
>
>
http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-man/
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Systemd
That includes links to such "perls of wisdom" as
http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken
which in effect says: "I broke it and I totally do not care. Anyway,
this is all your fault as you are stupid enough to run a system
laid out not the way I like it." Why I am not surprised?
Did you read it? It actually says "I did not break it - it's been
broken for a while in a number of different ways".
--
--Per Bothner
per(a)bothner.com
http://per.bothner.com/