On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 09:48 -0600, Adam Miller wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Adam Williamson awilliam@redhat.com wrote:
<SNIP> > "Fedora CURRENT_RELEASE+1" <-- the official name is Branched, you can > just say 'Fedora Branched', and link to the Branched page - > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Branched . You can put a little > explanation of what Branched is in brackets if you feel it necessary, I > guess. >
Fixed in the wiki page.
Actually, now I think about it, the group is intended to be used for stable releases too. Should we write it as if that's already in place? Something like:
"The Proven Testers are a dedicated group of the Fedora Quality Assurance Community who work towards making sure updated Critical Path packages for stable Fedora releases and the upcoming stable release ('Branched') are not broken"?
The line "The QA group within FAS will grant the ability to add karma inside of Bodhi to the Critical Path packages within Fedora CURRENT_RELEASE+1." seems out of place - is it an orphan?
That verbage was a little off and has been clarified (at least in my mind, but verification from others is welcome!)
I think it should say 'ProvenTesters group', not 'QA group'. The point of the proventesters project is to fulfill this role (of giving 'weighted' feedback); the way Bodhi currently uses the QA and releng groups to do this is just a short-term bodge. When we put ProvenTesters in place, it will be members of that group whose feedback is weighted, not QA/releng members.