On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Michael Cronenworth mike@cchtml.com wrote:
Nettle contains many pieces so I've taken an alternative approach to packaging it.
Yes, I noticed the separate libraries but was doing a minimal packaging job.
I wonder, is the package name "libnettle" acceptable? Generally the main package name needs to be the same as the upstream name, which is just nettle.
Also, the Requires: on the sub-packages should probably be arch specific, i.e.:
Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} should be Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
Richard