================================================ #fedora-blocker-review: f20beta-blocker-review-4 ================================================
Meeting started by kparal at 16:02:28 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-10-16/f20beta-bl... .
Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (kparal, 16:02:39) * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (kparal, 16:06:19) * We'll be following the process outlined at: (kparal, 16:06:19) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (kparal, 16:06:19) * The bugs up for review today are available at: (kparal, 16:06:22) * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (kparal, 16:06:23)
* Introduction (kparal, 16:06:34) * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (kparal, 16:06:45) * We'll be following the process outlined at: (kparal, 16:06:45) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (kparal, 16:06:45) * The bugs up for review today are available at: (kparal, 16:06:45) * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (kparal, 16:06:46) * The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (kparal, 16:06:53) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Beta_Release_Criteria (kparal, 16:07:03) * Up for review today, we have: (kparal, 16:07:15) * 4 Proposed Blockers (kparal, 16:07:22) * 8 Accepted Blockers (kparal, 16:07:23) * 5 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (kparal, 16:07:23) * 3 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (kparal, 16:07:23)
* (1017435) Anaconda uses LVM when Standard Partition is selected in text mode (kparal, 16:08:09) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017435 (kparal, 16:08:10) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (kparal, 16:08:10) * AGREED: 1013586 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 beta release criterion for text mode and standard partitions: "When using the guided partitioning flow, the installer must be able to: Complete an installation using any combination of disk configuration options it allows the user to select " (kparal, 16:11:13)
* (1017977) FormatDestroyError: error wiping old signatures from /dev/vda2: 1 (kparal, 16:11:34) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017977 (kparal, 16:11:34) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (kparal, 16:11:34) * AGREED: 1017977 - RejectedBlocker - This is rejected as a blocker until someone else can also reproduce the issue or the reporter can provide us with a clear steps that would help us reproduce the issue. (kparal, 16:18:30)
* (1019541) unknown install shows up as entire disks instead of mount points of selected disks (kparal, 16:18:42) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019541 (kparal, 16:18:42) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (kparal, 16:18:42) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019541#c8 (adamw, 16:25:25) * ACTION: kparal to test or delegate 1019541 with valid partition tables and previous BIOS install and no ESP booted with UEFI (kparal, 16:53:27)
* (1019500) device factories need to set a default name if empty name given for defined device (kparal, 16:54:08) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019500 (kparal, 16:54:08) * Proposed Blocker, python-blivet, ASSIGNED (kparal, 16:54:08) * AGREED: 1019500 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 beta release criterion for RAID installs with unnamed array: "When using the custom partitioning flow, the installer must be able to: Reject or disallow invalid disk and volume configurations without crashing." (kparal, 17:06:12)
* (1016801) "Don't install the latest software updates" box is unchecked by default, can't be checked permanently (kparal, 17:07:12) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016801 (kparal, 17:07:13) * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda, ASSIGNED (kparal, 17:07:13) * AGREED: 1016801 - AcceptedFreezeException - Updates download checkbox might be an important feature for some people and doesn't present large risk. It can't be fixed post-release. A fix would be considered as a freeze exception. (kparal, 17:16:38)
* (1016566) Installing a package silently fails if the GPG key for the yum repo is not installed (kparal, 17:16:48) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016566 (kparal, 17:16:48) * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, gnome-software, ASSIGNED (kparal, 17:16:48) * AGREED: 1016566 - AcceptedFreezeException - Installing software using gnome-software is an important feature and we will consider this fix even after freeze. If anyone finds out that update (not install) is not working with a missing gpg key, please propose this as a blocker bug. (kparal, 17:28:18)
* (1011714) btrfs scrub finds csum corruption after btrfs balance (kparal, 17:28:27) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011714 (kparal, 17:28:27) * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, kernel, POST (kparal, 17:28:27) * AGREED: 1011714 - AcceptedFreezeException - We would like to avoid data corruption on btrfs. A patch is ready and seems to be safe. We will consider it past freeze. (kparal, 17:36:50)
* (1017683) Invalid UID in persistent keyring name (kparal, 17:37:36) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017683 (kparal, 17:37:36) * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, kernel, MODIFIED (kparal, 17:37:36) * AGREED: 1017683 - AcceptedFreezeException - This is a serious issue for Kerberos users. A fix would be considered past freeze. (kparal, 17:44:05)
* (1012141) [abrt] pulseaudio-4.0-4.gita89ca.fc20: core_free: Process /usr/bin/pulseaudio was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT) (kparal, 17:45:23) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012141 (kparal, 17:45:23) * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, pulseaudio, NEW (kparal, 17:45:23) * AGREED: 1012141 - AcceptedFreezeException - This is a visible and annoying crash. An early and safe fix would be considered past freeze. (kparal, 17:51:27)
* (1016959) ValueError: Cannot remove non-leaf device 'btrfs.14' (kparal, 17:53:39) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016959 (kparal, 17:53:39) * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, NEW (kparal, 17:53:39) * this is waiting for developers action (kparal, 17:55:12) * We don't know whether this is going to be fixed before go/no-go, dlehman is busy with other bugs (kparal, 18:02:20)
* (1010495) Apple Mac EFI: you have not created a bootloader stage1 target device (kparal, 18:02:46) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010495 (kparal, 18:02:46) * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED (kparal, 18:02:46) * the current patch is incomplete and we're waiting for bcl to refine the patch and submit it (kparal, 18:04:20)
* (986575) installer fails to apply lower bound to resize requests in custom spoke (kparal, 18:05:17) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986575 (kparal, 18:05:17) * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED (kparal, 18:05:17) * this is a fairly simple fix, but it hasn't be implemented yet. waiting on developers (kparal, 18:07:42)
* (1013586) SizeNotPositiveError: spec= param must be >=0 (kparal, 18:08:42) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013586 (kparal, 18:08:42) * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, NEW (kparal, 18:08:42) * this is still waiting for developer action. the fix is expected to be invasive and affect many parts of the installer (kparal, 18:12:27) * AGREED: 1013586 - AcceptedBlocker - We move this blocker from Beta to Final, because we have an explicit shrinking criterion there, as it was originally intended: "Any installer mechanism for resizing storage volumes must correctly attempt the requested operation.". If the fix is ready in time, please propose as Beta FE. (kparal, 18:31:06)
* (1000891) DVD is oversized (larger than 4.7 GB) (kparal, 18:31:19) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000891 (kparal, 18:31:19) * Accepted Blocker, distribution, MODIFIED (kparal, 18:31:19) * this seems to be a pungi bug, waiting for dgilmore (kparal, 18:33:22)
* (1015234) F20 Beta TC1 ARM disk images unable to find root filesystem (kparal, 18:35:12) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015234 (kparal, 18:35:12) * Accepted Blocker, dracut, ASSIGNED (kparal, 18:35:12) * discussion is still ongoing as how to fix this properly. it's not clear whether this is fixed with the latest compose. it would be a good idea to ask the reporter to retest (kparal, 18:38:59) * ACTION: adamw to ask Harald and Dennis about bug 1015234 (kparal, 18:39:25)
* (1013767) rootfs on thinp not found, startup failure (kparal, 18:39:54) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013767 (kparal, 18:39:55) * Accepted Blocker, dracut, NEW (kparal, 18:39:55) * the developers are working on this, nothing to do from QA perspective (kparal, 18:42:08)
* (1013800) devicetree.py:1293:handleVgLvs:DeviceTreeError: failed to look up thin pool (kparal, 18:42:42) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013800 (kparal, 18:42:42) * Accepted Blocker, python-blivet, ASSIGNED (kparal, 18:42:42) * patch is ready for this one. dlehman needs to submit it (kparal, 18:44:57)
* Open Discussion <your bugs here> (kparal, 18:46:38)
Meeting ended at 18:48:41 UTC.
Action Items ------------ * kparal to test or delegate 1019541 with valid partition tables and previous BIOS install and no ESP booted with UEFI * adamw to ask Harald and Dennis about bug 1015234
Action Items, by person ----------------------- * adamw * adamw to ask Harald and Dennis about bug 1015234 * kparal * kparal to test or delegate 1019541 with valid partition tables and previous BIOS install and no ESP booted with UEFI * **UNASSIGNED** * (none)
People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * kparal (290) * adamw (205) * tflink (121) * dlehman (49) * roshi (28) * jwb (24) * jreznik (24) * pwhalen (10) * Viking-Ice (10) * mkrizek (7) * zodbot (6) * satellit (3) * satellit_RPi (3) * leigh123linux (2) * narekb (2)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot