On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:34:40PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
Scott Robbins wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 05:08:35PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
John Summerfield wrote:
If openbox (etc) is doing what it ought, that's fine. It seems very strange to me, and not something I care a lot about:-)
Openbox is fine, there are no bugs there that I've noticed. It comes with a very small default menu, which may or may not consist of items the user has installed. It has some default config files which are where
Menu items that don't work seem like bugs to me. Especially when one of them appears to be its configuration tool.
Heh, I see your point. However, in this case, I believe it would be an Openbox bug rather than Fedora's. Anyway, that openbox config thing doesn't do very much, I think it gives a choice of themes. Keys and menu items are done by hand-editing xml files.
There is a fine line between bug and feature--for example, Openbox deliberately dropped the toolbar when upgrading from 2 to 3 (or perhaps somewhere in the 3.x series.) I'd consider it a regression, but others think it's a good thing. <shrug>