================================================ #fedora-blocker-review: f20beta-blocker-review-3 ================================================
Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-10-09/f20beta-bl... Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-10-09/f20beta-bl... Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-10-09/f20beta-bl...
Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (tflink, 16:01:25)
* Introduction (tflink, 16:05:45) * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and freeze exception bugs. (tflink, 16:05:54) * We'll be following the process outlined at: (tflink, 16:06:00) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (tflink, 16:06:00) * The bugs up for review today are available at: (tflink, 16:06:05) * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (tflink, 16:06:05) * The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (tflink, 16:06:12) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Beta_Release_Criteria (tflink, 16:06:12) * Up for review today, we have: (tflink, 16:06:17) * 6 Proposed Blockers (tflink, 16:06:26) * 12 Accepted Blockers (tflink, 16:06:26) * 2 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (tflink, 16:06:26) * 5 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (tflink, 16:06:26)
* (1009809) KeyError: 'name' (tflink, 16:07:58) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009809 (tflink, 16:07:58) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ON_QA (tflink, 16:07:59) * AGREED: 1009809 - RejectedBlocker - As stated in the F20 beta criteria, only one of [nfs, nfsiso] is required to work for beta. As nfs package sources have been confirmed to work, this is rejected as a release blocking bug for f20 beta. (tflink, 16:11:08)
* (1013586) SizeNotPositiveError: spec= param must be >=0 (tflink, 16:11:16) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013586 (tflink, 16:11:16) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:11:16) * AGREED: 1013586 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 beta release criterion for partitions not created using parted: "When using the guided partitioning flow, the installer must be able to ... Complete an installation using any combination of disk configuration options it allows the user to select" (tflink, 16:18:06)
* (1015220) can't log in as ordinary user after text install unless under user spoke, password field is last one filled out (tflink, 16:18:29) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015220 (tflink, 16:18:32) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, VERIFIED (tflink, 16:18:34) * AGREED: 1015220 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha release criterion for text installs where the user password isn't the last spoke entered: "A system installed without a graphical package set must boot to a state where it is possible to log in through at least one of the default virtual consoles." (tflink, 16:23:23)
* (1016927) Fedora 20 Beta TC2 Anaconda Netinstall gets error checking software configuration (tflink, 16:23:36) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016927 (tflink, 16:23:39) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:23:42) * AGREED: 1016927 - This would be a blocker if the broken packages were actually on any images but it was fixed quickly enough such that it was never included. Thus, it is rejected as a release blocking bug for f20 beta. (tflink, 16:34:11)
* (1016959) ValueError: Cannot remove non-leaf device 'btrfs.14' (tflink, 16:34:24) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016959 (tflink, 16:34:27) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:34:30) * AGREED: 1016959 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 beta release criterion, assuming that the disk layout in question is not considered valid: "When using the custom partitioning flow, the installer must be able to ... Reject or disallow invalid disk and volume configurations without crashing." (tflink, 17:00:13)
* (1015234) F20 Beta TC1 ARM disk images unable to find root filesystem (tflink, 17:01:31) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015234 (tflink, 17:01:34) * Proposed Blocker, dracut, NEW (tflink, 17:01:36) * AGREED: 1015234 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha release criterion for ARM images in virt and on bare-metal: "A system installed with a release-blocking desktop must boot to a log in screen where it is possible to log in to a working desktop using a user account created during installation or a 'first boot' utility." (tflink, 17:09:19)
* (1011714) btrfs scrub finds csum corruption after btrfs balance (tflink, 17:12:41) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011714 (tflink, 17:12:45) * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, kernel, MODIFIED (tflink, 17:12:47) * AGREED: 1011714 - We'd like to see more information on how big/invasive/risky this patch is before making a decision on FE, will ask relevant devs and revisit at the next review meeting (tflink, 17:31:46)
* (1015731) netinstall f20 Beta TC-1 x86_64 of sugar-desktop boots to console login (tflink, 17:32:04) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015731 (tflink, 17:32:07) * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, sugar, NEW (tflink, 17:32:09) * AGREED: 1015731 - AcceptedFreezeException - This prevents sugar-desktop from booting or functioning properly after install. As a secondary DE, a tested fix would be considered after freeze. (tflink, 17:37:05)
* (901917) rescue a fedora system mode doesn't recognize luks installation (tflink, 17:40:19) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901917 (tflink, 17:40:22) * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (tflink, 17:40:25) * this has been verified, pushed stable and closed (tflink, 17:40:32)
* (986575) installer fails to apply lower bound to resize requests in custom spoke (tflink, 17:41:14) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986575 (tflink, 17:41:17) * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED (tflink, 17:41:19) * no apparant movement on this bug yet (tflink, 17:42:23) * devs are aware of the issue, proposed it as a blocker (tflink, 17:42:33)
* (1010495) Apple Mac EFI: you have not created a bootloader stage1 target device (tflink, 17:48:17) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010495 (tflink, 17:48:20) * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED (tflink, 17:48:23) * work on this has been moving along, doesn't appear as if anything is needed from us at this time (tflink, 17:48:40) * there is an updates.img, it has not been rolled into anaconda as of 20.23-1 (tflink, 17:49:31)
* (1012504) FSError: filesystem already exists (tflink, 17:49:51) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012504 (tflink, 17:49:52) * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED (tflink, 17:49:52) * this is no longer an issue and it can now be closed (tflink, 17:51:18)
* (1000891) DVD is oversized (larger than 4.7 GB) (tflink, 17:52:05) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000891 (tflink, 17:52:05) * Accepted Blocker, distribution, MODIFIED (tflink, 17:52:05) * F20 beta TC2 is still oversize (tflink, 17:52:19) * a different fix is needed than the KS exclusion, looking for a different method to exclude the gimp-help files (tflink, 17:53:07) * devs are aware of the issue, looking for a fix (tflink, 17:53:55)
* (1013767) rootfs on thinp not found, startup failure (tflink, 17:54:49) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013767 (tflink, 17:54:49) * Accepted Blocker, dracut, NEW (tflink, 17:54:49) * work is progressing on this bug, nothing is needed from us at this point (tflink, 17:55:32)
* (1009132) updates-plugin-WARNING **: failed to download: The backend exited unexpectedly. (tflink, 17:57:45) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009132 (tflink, 17:57:48) * Accepted Blocker, gnome-settings-daemon, ASSIGNED (tflink, 17:57:51) * ACTION: pschindl to re-test #1009132 to make sure it's still an issue (tflink, 17:58:42) * there appears to have been no movement on this for weeks, we're not even sure it's still an issue (tflink, 17:59:50) * ACTION: pschindl to sync up with hughsie about this issue after re-testing (tflink, 18:00:21)
* (1000893) Desktop Live is oversized (larger than 1 GB) (tflink, 18:01:02) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000893 (tflink, 18:01:02) * Accepted Blocker, LiveCD, NEW (tflink, 18:01:03) * LINK: http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/20-Beta-TC2/Live/x86_64/ (dan408-, 18:02:23) * ACTION: dan408 to follow up with the gnome folks on getting the desktop spin under size (tflink, 18:43:33)
* (1016842) devicetree.py:1293:handleVgLvs:DeviceTreeError: failed to look up thin pool (tflink, 18:47:49) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016842 (tflink, 18:47:52) * Accepted Blocker, python-blivet, ASSIGNED (tflink, 18:47:55) * this is not actually a blocker, clone artifact (tflink, 18:49:31)
* (1013800) devicetree.py:1293:handleVgLvs:DeviceTreeError: failed to look up thin pool (tflink, 18:56:52) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013800 (tflink, 18:56:55) * Accepted Blocker, python-blivet, ASSIGNED (tflink, 18:56:57) * there is a fix available per c#7 but another issue was found during development (tflink, 18:57:40) * currently waiting on a fix for this new issue (tflink, 18:58:11) * there was supposed to be more conversation with lvm folks by this past monday, no update since then - ask for more information in bug (tflink, 18:59:09)
* Open Floor (tflink, 18:59:42) * next blocker review meeting will be on 2013-10-16 @ 16:00 UTC (tflink, 19:00:57) * if needed, another meeting will be scheduled for 2013-10-14 (tflink, 19:01:23)
Meeting ended at 19:01:38 UTC.
Action Items ------------ * pschindl to re-test #1009132 to make sure it's still an issue * pschindl to sync up with hughsie about this issue after re-testing * dan408 to follow up with the gnome folks on getting the desktop spin under size
Action Items, by person ----------------------- * pschindl * pschindl to re-test #1009132 to make sure it's still an issue * pschindl to sync up with hughsie about this issue after re-testing * **UNASSIGNED** * dan408 to follow up with the gnome folks on getting the desktop spin under size
People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * tflink (285) * cmurf (119) * Viking-Ice (100) * roshi (36) * kparal (36) * jreznik (21) * satellit (18) * pschindl (16) * pwhalen (12) * dan408- (7) * zodbot (6) * mkrizek (4) * jreznik2 (4)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot