Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, John Summerfield wrote:
maybe for the future, the description for this list could include something like this text:
If you want to track and discuss testing package updates, then you might join fedora-test-updates too.
yes, that sounds about right. my objection was based on this list's own description in the "To:" line above, and i emphasize:
"For testers of Fedora Core development ***releases***"
not "packages". "releases". so, not to put too fine a point on it, unless you have something to discuss related to a fedora development ***release***, you should take that information elsewhere, and a new ML would seem to be the perfect solution.
rday
I joined for the same reason as rday. I want to be here to talk about how the next _release_ is broken, and maybe opine as to what its content should be.
I'm not a hacker, and I'm not sure I want to flog myself with raw hide. As I recall from the Westerns I used to read, it hurts.