Le Ven 29 janvier 2010 17:59, David Malcolm a écrit :
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 15:45 +0000, Rawhide Report wrote:
[snip]
Looks like whatever generates this report is reordering items in the changelog relative to the %changelog in the specfile, but in some surprising ways; is this a known issue?
Normally the items in a %changelog are in order most-recent through least-recent.
But in this report, see e.g. how 2.2-9 appears, then 2.2-10:
audacious-2.2-10.fc13
- Thu Jan 28 2010 Michael Schwendt mschwendt@fedoraproject.org - 2.2-9
- Let set_tuple_cb() work on a copied tuple (the metadata updates flood is too racy IMO).
- Fix tuple_copy().
- Thu Jan 28 2010 Michael Schwendt mschwendt@fedoraproject.org - 2.2-10
- Fix tuple_copy() further (it was completely broken as the mowgli dict wasn't copied at all).
This is one reason I prefer to use the following changelog style
* Thu Jan 28 2010 Michael Schwendt mschwendt@fedoraproject.org - 2.2-10 - Fix tuple_copy() further (it was completely broken as the mowgli dict wasn't copied at all). - 2.2-9 - Let set_tuple_cb() work on a copied tuple (the metadata updates flood is too racy IMO). - Fix tuple_copy().