new rawhide gtk breaks openoffice

[Bill Huizinga]

I'm seeing a problem with the new -5 build of gtk2/gtk2-devel and
openoffice 1.1.2-10.

I have two documents (company sensitive, so I can't give them for bug
verification; sorry), one small and one large, both in .sxw format (but
they were both originally imported as .doc).  If I open the small one
using the recent files option, and the large one using the recent files
option, I get the attached crash (output by bug-buddy and less than
totally useful without the debug info).  This is 100% repeatable.

I believe this to be a gtk problem because it goes away if I downgrade
back to the -4 builds.

I'd create a Bugzilla entry for it, but I can't figure out a clean case
(ie, not requiring my two oddball documents) which will cause the
problem.

[Harald Hoyer]

William S Huizinga wrote:
>  I'm seeing a problem with the new -5 build of gtk2/gtk2-devel
> and
>  openoffice 1.1.2-10.
>  
>  I have two documents (company sensitive, so I can't give them for bug
>  verification; sorry), one small and one large, both in .sxw format (but
>  they were both originally imported as .doc).  If I open the small one
>  using the recent files option, and the large one using the recent files
>  option, I get the attached crash (output by bug-buddy and less than
>  totally useful without the debug info).  This is 100% repeatable.
>  
>  I believe this to be a gtk problem because it goes away if I downgrade
>  back to the -4 builds.
>  
>  I'd create a Bugzilla entry for it, but I can't figure out a clean case
>  (ie, not requiring my two oddball documents) which will cause the
>  problem.
>  
>   
a half-complete bugzilla entry is better than no entry at all!

[Bill Huizinga]

On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 15:37 +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>  William S Huizinga wrote:
>  > I'm seeing a problem with the new -5 build of gtk2/gtk2-devel and
>  > openoffice 1.1.2-10.
>  > 
>  > I have two documents (company sensitive, so I can't give them for bug
>  > verification; sorry), one small and one large, both in .sxw format (but
>  > they were both originally imported as .doc).  If I open the small one
>  > using the recent files option, and the large one using the recent files
>  > option, I get the attached crash (output by bug-buddy and less than
>  > totally useful without the debug info).  This is 100% repeatable.
>  > 
>  > I believe this to be a gtk problem because it goes away if I downgrade
>  > back to the -4 builds.
>  > 
>  > I'd create a Bugzilla entry for it, but I can't figure out a clean case
>  > (ie, not requiring my two oddball documents) which will cause the
>  > problem.
>  > 
>  > 
>  
>  a half-complete bugzilla entry is better than no entry at all! 
As you wish.  Bug #137969.

---
wsh

>  -- 
>  fedora-test-list mailing list
>  fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
>  To unsubscribe: 
>  http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Colin Charles]

On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 09:06 -0500, William S Huizinga wrote:
>  I have two documents (company sensitive, so I can't give them for
> bug
>  verification; sorry), one small and one large, both in .sxw format (but
>  they were both originally imported as .doc).  If I open the small one
>  using the recent files option, and the large one using the recent files
>  option, I get the attached crash (output by bug-buddy and less than
>  totally useful without the debug info).  This is 100% repeatable. 
Try creating the test case without the company sensitivities, and see if
can happen

>  I'd create a Bugzilla entry for it, but I can't figure out a
> clean case
>  (ie, not requiring my two oddball documents) which will cause the
>  problem. 
I saw calls to /usr/lib/nvidia/libGLcore.so.1

Are you running Nvidia binary drivers?
-- 
Colin Charles, byte(a)aeon.com.my
http://www.bytebot.net/
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, 
then you win." -- Mohandas Gandhi

[Bill Huizinga]

On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 02:06 +1100, Colin Charles wrote:
>  On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 09:06 -0500, William S Huizinga wrote:
>  > I have two documents (company sensitive, so I can't give them for bug
>  > verification; sorry), one small and one large, both in .sxw format (but
>  > they were both originally imported as .doc).  If I open the small one
>  > using the recent files option, and the large one using the recent files
>  > option, I get the attached crash (output by bug-buddy and less than
>  > totally useful without the debug info).  This is 100% repeatable.
>  
>  Try creating the test case without the company sensitivities, and see if
>  can happen 
I've determined that it doesn't matter what the first document is, just
that one window has to be open already for the problem to occur when the
second window opens.  The doc in question is not all that sensitive and
I wouldn't have a problem sending it to someone directly, I just don't
want to post it publicly.

>  > I'd create a Bugzilla entry for it, but I can't figure
> out a clean case
>  > (ie, not requiring my two oddball documents) which will cause the
>  > problem.
>  
>  I saw calls to /usr/lib/nvidia/libGLcore.so.1
>  
>  Are you running Nvidia binary drivers? 
Fair enough.  Here's a dump without them.

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/lib/ooo-1.1/program/soffice.bin'

(no debugging symbols found)...Using host libthread_db library
"/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging
symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[Thread debugging using
libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -183376192 (LWP 1375)]
[New Thread -324150352 (LWP 1409)]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -183376192 (LWP 1375)]
[New Thread -324150352 (LWP 1409)]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -183376192 (LWP 1375)]
[New Thread -324150352 (LWP 1409)]
[New Thread -313394256 (LWP 1407)]
[New Thread -313050192 (LWP 1405)]
[New Thread -302560336 (LWP 1404)]
[New Thread -263185488 (LWP 1398)]
[New Thread -212644944 (LWP 1393)]
[New Thread -199545936 (LWP 1392)]
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging
symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...0x001017a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80
() from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
#0  0x001017a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
#1  0x008d2a3b in __waitpid_nocancel () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#2  0x0087e485 in do_system () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#3  0x0087e833 in system () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#4  0x00a9479d in system () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
#5  0xf632783f in osl_releaseVolumeDeviceHandle ()
   from /usr/lib/ooo-1.1/program/libsal.so.3
#6  0xf6327adc in osl_releaseVolumeDeviceHandle ()
   from /usr/lib/ooo-1.1/program/libsal.so.3
#7  <signal handler called>
#8  0xef3a3001 in ?? () from /usr/lib/ooo-1.1/program/libsw645li.so
#9  0xee0b3ce0 in ?? ()
#10 0x0000004f in ?? ()
#11 0x00000001 in ?? ()
#12 0x000005a0 in ?? ()
#13 0x0016c16c in ?? ()
#14 0x0000df84 in ?? ()
#15 0x00000000 in ?? ()

Thread 8 (Thread -199545936 (LWP 1392)):
#0  0x001017a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
No symbol table info available.
#1  0x00a936e8 in accept () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#2  0xf63283c2 in osl_acceptPipe ()
from /usr/lib/ooo-1.1/program/libsal.so.3
No symbol table info available.
#3  0xf654f28e in vos::OPipe::accept ()
   from /usr/lib/ooo-1.1/program/libvos3gcc3.so
No symbol table info available.
#4  0x0806f7bd in desktop::OfficeIPCThread::run ()
No symbol table info available.
#5  0xf6548db2 in vos::_cpp_OThread_WorkerFunction ()
   from /usr/lib/ooo-1.1/program/libvos3gcc3.so
No symbol table info available.
#6  0xf6548d97 in _OThread_WorkerFunction ()
   from /usr/lib/ooo-1.1/program/libvos3gcc3.so
No symbol table info available.
#7  0xf631d3a7 in osl_getSystemLocale ()
   from /usr/lib/ooo-1.1/program/libsal.so.3
No symbol table info available.
#8  0x00a8e1d5 in start_thread () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#9  0x0090f2da in clone () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
No symbol table info available.

Thread 7 (Thread -212644944 (LWP 1393)):
#0  0x001017a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
No symbol table info available.
#1  0x00a90d3c in pthread_cond_timedwait@(a)GLIBC_2.3.2 ()
   from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#2  0xf6319daf in osl_waitCondition ()
   from /usr/lib/ooo-1.1/program/libsal.so.3
No symbol table info available.
#3  0xf65423fd in vos::OCondition::wait ()
   from /usr/lib/ooo-1.1/program/libvos3gcc3.so
No symbol table info available.
#4  0xf654c410 in vos::OTimerManager::run ()
   from /usr/lib/ooo-1.1/program/libvos3gcc3.so
No symbol table info available.
#5  0xf6548db2 in vos::_cpp_OThread_WorkerFunction ()
   from /usr/lib/ooo-1.1/program/libvos3gcc3.so
No symbol table info available.
#6  0xf6548d97 in _OThread_WorkerFunction ()
   from /usr/lib/ooo-1.1/program/libvos3gcc3.so
No symbol table info available.
#7  0xf631d3a7 in osl_getSystemLocale ()
   from /usr/lib/ooo-1.1/program/libsal.so.3
No symbol table info available.
#8  0x00a8e1d5 in start_thread () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#9  0x0090f2da in clone () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
No symbol table info available.

Thread 6 (Thread -263185488 (LWP 1398)):
#0  0x001017a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
No symbol table info available.
#1  0x009056a4 in poll () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
No symbol table info available.
#2  0xf051e855 in ?? ()
from /usr/lib/ooo-1.1/program/libdtransX11645li.so
No symbol table info available.
#3  0xf051e9c7 in ?? ()
from /usr/lib/ooo-1.1/program/libdtransX11645li.so
No symbol table info available.
#4  0xf631d3a7 in osl_getSystemLocale ()
   from /usr/lib/ooo-1.1/program/libsal.so.3
No symbol table info available.
#5  0x00a8e1d5 in start_thread () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#6  0x0090f2da in clone () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
No symbol table info available.

Thread 5 (Thread -302560336 (LWP 1404)):
#0  0x001017a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
No symbol table info available.
#1  0x009056a4 in poll () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
No symbol table info available.
#2  0xf5cef156 in g_main_loop_get_context ()
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#3  0xf5cee590 in g_main_context_dispatch ()
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#4  0xf5ceec53 in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#5  0x027cebff in link_thread_io_context ()
from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#6  0xf5d451a8 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#7  0xedf74458 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#8  0xf5d081bd in g_static_private_free ()
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
No symbol table info available.


>  -- 
>  Colin Charles, byte(a)aeon.com.my
>  http://www.bytebot.net/
>  "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, 
>  then you win." -- Mohandas Gandhi
>

[Dan Williams]

On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 11:00 -0500, Bill Huizinga wrote:
>  On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 02:06 +1100, Colin Charles wrote:
>  > On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 09:06 -0500, William S Huizinga wrote:
>  > > I have two documents (company sensitive, so I can't give them for bug
>  > > verification; sorry), one small and one large, both in .sxw format (but
>  > > they were both originally imported as .doc).  If I open the small one
>  > > using the recent files option, and the large one using the recent files
>  > > option, I get the attached crash (output by bug-buddy and less than
>  > > totally useful without the debug info).  This is 100% repeatable.
>  > 
>  > Try creating the test case without the company sensitivities, and see if
>  > can happen
>  
>  I've determined that it doesn't matter what the first document is, just
>  that one window has to be open already for the problem to occur when the
>  second window opens.  The doc in question is not all that sensitive and
>  I wouldn't have a problem sending it to someone directly, I just don't
>  want to post it publicly. 
I can't reproduce this with two random docs lying around, opening the
first with recent items and then the second with recent items without
closing the first.  Could you send the documents in question directly to
me?  I will not release them publicly.

Thanks!
Dan

[Dan Williams]

I can't seem to reproduce with a prerelease -11, opening some random doc
using recent-items first, then opening LP-*.sxw from recent-items
second...  Is that basically what you're doing?

I'm running gtk2-2.4.13-5.

Dan

On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 11:43 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
>  On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 11:00 -0500, Bill Huizinga wrote:
>  > On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 02:06 +1100, Colin Charles wrote:
>  > > On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 09:06 -0500, William S Huizinga wrote:
>  > > > I have two documents (company sensitive, so I can't give them for bug
>  > > > verification; sorry), one small and one large, both in .sxw format (but
>  > > > they were both originally imported as .doc).  If I open the small one
>  > > > using the recent files option, and the large one using the recent files
>  > > > option, I get the attached crash (output by bug-buddy and less than
>  > > > totally useful without the debug info).  This is 100% repeatable.
>  > > 
>  > > Try creating the test case without the company sensitivities, and see if
>  > > can happen
>  > 
>  > I've determined that it doesn't matter what the first document is, just
>  > that one window has to be open already for the problem to occur when the
>  > second window opens.  The doc in question is not all that sensitive and
>  > I wouldn't have a problem sending it to someone directly, I just don't
>  > want to post it publicly.
>  
>  I can't reproduce this with two random docs lying around, opening the
>  first with recent items and then the second with recent items without
>  closing the first.  Could you send the documents in question directly to
>  me?  I will not release them publicly.
>  
>  Thanks!
>  Dan
>

[Colin Charles]

On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 11:50 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
>  I can't seem to reproduce with a prerelease -11, opening some
> random doc
>  using recent-items first, then opening LP-*.sxw from recent-items
>  second...  Is that basically what you're doing?
>  
>  I'm running gtk2-2.4.13-5. 
Neither can I, and I'm running:
gtk2-2.4.13-5.ppc
openoffice.org-1.1.2-10.ppc

Pretty much rawhide latest...
-- 
Colin Charles, byte(a)aeon.com.my
http://www.bytebot.net/
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, 
then you win." -- Mohandas Gandhi