What happened to kernel 2.6.32?

[Jim Haynes]

I've been running one for testing in a F12 system.  When I looked at
pub/fedora/linux/updates/testing/12 the kernel in there is a 2.6.31
kernel and all the others I can find are 2.6.33 kernels.  Is 2.6.32
going to be skipped?



jhhaynes at earthlink dot net

[Petrus de Calguarium]

Jim Haynes wrote:

>  Is 2.6.32 going to be skipped?
>   
I am running f12 and have updates-testing enabled and I have been getting 2.6.32s
for 
a couple of weeks or so (there hasn't been a new one in updates-testing for about 10 
days now, however). To the best of my knowledge, there has not been a 2.6.33 for f12 
yet, not even in updates-testing, otherwise yum would have installed it here.

[Genes MailLists]

On 02/17/2010 01:42 AM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
>  Jim Haynes wrote:
>  
> > Is 2.6.32 going to be skipped?
> >
>  I am running f12 and have updates-testing enabled and I have been getting 2.6.32s for 
>  a couple of weeks or so (there hasn't been a new one in updates-testing for about 10
>
>  days now, however). To the best of my knowledge, there has not been a 2.6.33 for f12 
>  yet, not even in updates-testing, otherwise yum would have installed it here.
>   
 Best I can tell 2 things (looking at koji) - someone decided to wait
for a fix for ABRT for some reason - looks like that went in yesterday.
Its possible that was the major holdup but its unclear.

 Also today a bunch of nouveau changes on top of that - that build is
2.6.32.8-55 - perhaps it will go to testing and from there be nice to
get to stable - time will tell.

 This kernel is the first since 2.6.30 to not crap out on intel iwlagn
when attached to N class access-points (the warn_slowpath bug) and many
more wonderful benefits.

  I too hope it will meander its way gently into updates!!

  gene/

 [I am now running 2.6.32.8-55 out of koji and using nouveau with no
problem yet]

[Szabo Akos]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

2010.02.18. 2:10 keltezéssel, Mail Lists írta:
>  On 02/17/2010 01:42 AM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> > Jim Haynes wrote:
> >
> >> Is 2.6.32 going to be skipped?
>
>   Best I can tell 2 things (looking at koji) - someone decided to wait
>  for a fix for ABRT for some reason - looks like that went in yesterday.
>  Its possible that was the major holdup but its unclear.
>  
>   Also today a bunch of nouveau changes on top of that - that build is
>  2.6.32.8-55 - perhaps it will go to testing and from there be nice to
>  get to stable - time will tell. 
I hope it will be backported drm-intel changes too! With rawhide kernel
(recompiled, 2.6.33-0.44.rc8.git0.fc12), I can use kms, and Xorg is rock
stable, with intel drv again /it's never workd before to me, after
upgrading to fedora 12/

- -- 
Udvozlettel:
        Fonya

            Küldetésem ösztönözni az ütemes akció-rádiuszt.
                PGP key ID F86614E5, GPG key ID 83AD9365
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkt9ARcACgkQwAHtm4Otk2XlSgCfb5xZrrHphk+LID8L8Y7SQhpJ
> GS0AnRhJ3ZtDLBCvWBPZDavEoWvSErrz
> =HQuG
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[drago01]

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Szabo Akos <fonya(a)fatav.hu&gt; wrote:
>  -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>  Hash: SHA1
>
>  2010.02.18. 2:10 keltezéssel, Mail Lists írta:
> > On 02/17/2010 01:42 AM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> >> Jim Haynes wrote:
> >>
> >>> Is 2.6.32 going to be skipped?
> >
> >  Best I can tell 2 things (looking at koji) - someone decided to wait
> > for a fix for ABRT for some reason - looks like that went in yesterday.
> > Its possible that was the major holdup but its unclear.
> >
> >  Also today a bunch of nouveau changes on top of that - that build is
> > 2.6.32.8-55 - perhaps it will go to testing and from there be nice to
> > get to stable - time will tell.
>
>  I hope it will be backported drm-intel changes too! With rawhide kernel
>  (recompiled, 2.6.33-0.44.rc8.git0.fc12), I can use kms, and Xorg is rock
>  stable, with intel drv again /it's never workd before to me, after
>  upgrading to fedora 12/ 
It does use the drm of 2.6.33.

[Kyle McMartin]

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:58:01AM +0100, Szabo Akos wrote:
>  I hope it will be backported drm-intel changes too! With rawhide
> kernel
>  (recompiled, 2.6.33-0.44.rc8.git0.fc12), I can use kms, and Xorg is rock
>  stable, with intel drv again /it's never workd before to me, after
>  upgrading to fedora 12/
>   
Please pull it from koji, test it, and let me know in a reply if it
works?

We're very close to pushing it now that abrtd should be fixed.

regards, Kyle

[Kevin DeKorte]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/18/2010 07:39 AM, Kyle McMartin wrote:
>  On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:58:01AM +0100, Szabo Akos wrote:
> > I hope it will be backported drm-intel changes too! With rawhide kernel
> > (recompiled, 2.6.33-0.44.rc8.git0.fc12), I can use kms, and Xorg is rock
> > stable, with intel drv again /it's never workd before to me, after
> > upgrading to fedora 12/
> >
>  
>  Please pull it from koji, test it, and let me know in a reply if it
>  works?
>  
>  We're very close to pushing it now that abrtd should be fixed.
>  
>  regards, Kyle 
kernel-2.6.32.8-58.fc12 seems to be working pretty good on my Lenovo
T400 (with intel video enabled). The iwlagn seems a little better,
probably the weakest driver on the system.

Kevin

- -- 
Get my public GnuPG key from
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7D0BD5D1
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkt9cZ4ACgkQ6w2kMH0L1dF6nQCfWc9TnHZLMIbQ+FTKwASKOyGN
> Fe0AnRUNxcDtry2z8Xc0B0gJfJw4xvd/
> =Svzh
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Szabo Akos]

On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 09:39 -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
>  On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:58:01AM +0100, Szabo Akos wrote:
>  > I hope it will be backported drm-intel changes too! With rawhide kernel
>  > (recompiled, 2.6.33-0.44.rc8.git0.fc12), I can use kms, and Xorg is rock
>  > stable, with intel drv again /it's never workd before to me, after
>  > upgrading to fedora 12/
>  Please pull it from koji, test it, and let me know in a reply if it
>  works? 
I try kernel-2.6.32.8-58.fc12.i686
Sorry, it's not working :( When I log in gdm, after some minutes, the
display freeze, but keyboard, mouse buttons working right. I can switch
to the console, and back restart, shutdown etc. I try it with, and
without xorg.conf

From the kernel log:
Feb 18 19:13:13 localhost kernel: [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer
elapsed... GPU hung
Feb 18 19:13:13 localhost kernel: render error detected, EIR: 0x00000000
Feb 18 19:13:13 localhost kernel: [drm:i915_do_wait_request] *ERROR* i915_do_wait_request
returns -5 (awaiting 711 at 710)

And from the Xorg.0.log:
(II) intel(0): Modeline "1024x768"x60.0   65.00  1024 1048 1184 1344  768 771
777 806 (48.4 kHz)
(EE) intel(0): Failed to submit batch buffer, expect rendering corruption or even a frozen
display: Input/output error.
(WW) intel(0): i830_uxa_prepare_access: gtt bo map failed: Input/output error
(EE) intel(0): Failed to submit batch buffer, expect rendering corruption or even a frozen
display: Input/output error.
(EE) intel(0): Failed to submit batch buffer, expect rendering corruption or even a frozen
display: Input/output error.
(EE) intel(0): Failed to submit batch buffer, expect rendering corruption or even a frozen
display: Input/output error.
[...]
(EE) intel(0): Failed to submit batch buffer, expect rendering corruption or even a frozen
display: Input/output error.
(II) AIGLX: Suspending AIGLX clients for VT switch
(EE) intel(0): Failed to submit batch buffer, expect rendering corruption or even a frozen
display: Input/output error.

BTW, this bug exist with fedora 12, for example:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538563

PLS let me know, if You need any further info.

-- 
Szabo Akos <fonya(a)fatav.hu&gt;
Fatav Bt.