I'm not quite sure but I think Anaconda wanted to install about 850MB when doing a "minimum" install, and if I remember correctly from the previous releases this is a substantial increase, which also led to the fact that you now need both CD#1 _and_ CD#2 to do a minimum install (previously you only needed CD#1) Which at least I am kind of disappointed at, I prefer to do a minimum install and then "yum install" whatever I need later on. Why the huge increase of space needed?
Regards Jacob "not meaning to flame anything/anyone" Kroon
Jacob Kroon (d00jkr@efd.lth.se) said:
I'm not quite sure but I think Anaconda wanted to install about 850MB when doing a "minimum" install, and if I remember correctly from the previous releases this is a substantial increase, which also led to the fact that you now need both CD#1 _and_ CD#2 to do a minimum install (previously you only needed CD#1) Which at least I am kind of disappointed at, I prefer to do a minimum install and then "yum install" whatever I need later on. Why the huge increase of space needed?
Probably dependencies gone bad. Would have to look at the package set to know for sure.
Bill
Bill Nottingham (notting@redhat.com) said:
Jacob Kroon (d00jkr@efd.lth.se) said:
I'm not quite sure but I think Anaconda wanted to install about 850MB when doing a "minimum" install, and if I remember correctly from the previous releases this is a substantial increase, which also led to the fact that you now need both CD#1 _and_ CD#2 to do a minimum install (previously you only needed CD#1) Which at least I am kind of disappointed at, I prefer to do a minimum install and then "yum install" whatever I need later on. Why the huge increase of space needed?
Probably dependencies gone bad. Would have to look at the package set to know for sure.
OK, a test minimal install is pulling in openoffice.org-core (!?) for some reason. Unsure why as of yet.
Bill
On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 18:32 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
OK, a test minimal install is pulling in openoffice.org-core (!?) for some reason. Unsure why as of yet.
I attached a list of packages installed by a minimal text install (unselected all package groups).
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 00:11, Florin Andrei wrote:
On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 18:32 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
OK, a test minimal install is pulling in openoffice.org-core (!?) for some reason. Unsure why as of yet.
I attached a list of packages installed by a minimal text install (unselected all package groups).
Possibly related to the fact that both xmlsec1 and openoffice.org-core provide "libxmlsec1.so.1" albeit they install them to different directories.
$ rpm -qlp xmlsec1-1.2.7-4.i386.rpm | grep 'libxmlsec1.so.1$' /usr/lib/libxmlsec1.so.1 $ rpm -qlp openoffice.org-core-1.9.89-3.i386.rpm | \ grep 'libxmlsec1.so.1$' /usr/lib/openoffice.org1.9.89/program/libxmlsec1.so.1
--Mike Bird
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 03:11, Florin Andrei wrote:
On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 18:32 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
OK, a test minimal install is pulling in openoffice.org-core (!?) for some reason. Unsure why as of yet.
I attached a list of packages installed by a minimal text install (unselected all package groups).
Ugly: minimal install installs postgresql-server -- this makes no sense.
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 11:57 -0400, Gene C. wrote:
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 03:11, Florin Andrei wrote:
On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 18:32 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
OK, a test minimal install is pulling in openoffice.org-core (!?) for some reason. Unsure why as of yet.
I attached a list of packages installed by a minimal text install (unselected all package groups).
Ugly: minimal install installs postgresql-server -- this makes no sense.
Oh, damn. My mistake. That's the minimal install, plus PostgreSQL, Apache, PHP, ntpd and their dependencies.
I guess you can ignore my message, then. :-(
Jacob Kroon wrote:
I'm not quite sure but I think Anaconda wanted to install about 850MB when doing a "minimum" install, and if I remember correctly from the previous releases this is a substantial increase, which also led to the fact that you now need both CD#1 _and_ CD#2 to do a minimum install (previously you only needed CD#1) Which at least I am kind of disappointed at, I prefer to do a minimum install and then "yum install" whatever I need later on. Why the huge increase of space needed?
Regards Jacob "not meaning to flame anything/anyone" Kroon
Sorry about that, the release notes state it is 620MB for a minimum, dunno where I got 850MB from. You still need CD#1 and CD#2 though.
/Jacob
On Apr 11, 2005 5:46 PM, Jacob Kroon d00jkr@efd.lth.se wrote:
Jacob Kroon wrote:
Sorry about that, the release notes state it is 620MB for a minimum, dunno where I got 850MB from. You still need CD#1 and CD#2 though.
Jacob
Where did you find the release notes for FC4T2?
Richard Ramson wrote:
On Apr 11, 2005 5:46 PM, Jacob Kroon d00jkr@efd.lth.se wrote:
Jacob Kroon wrote:
Sorry about that, the release notes state it is 620MB for a minimum, dunno where I got 850MB from. You still need CD#1 and CD#2 though.
Jacob
Where did you find the release notes for FC4T2?
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/test/3.91/i386/os/RE...
/Jacob
-
Bill Nottingham -
Florin Andrei -
Gene C. -
Jacob Kroon -
Mike Bird -
Richard Ramson -
seth vidal